Sign language and pantomime production differentially engage frontal and parietal cortices
- PMID: 21909174
- PMCID: PMC3167215
- DOI: 10.1080/01690965.2010.492643
Sign language and pantomime production differentially engage frontal and parietal cortices
Abstract
We investigated the functional organization of neural systems supporting language production when the primary language articulators are also used for meaningful, but non-linguistic, expression such as pantomime. Fourteen hearing non-signers and 10 deaf native users of American Sign Language (ASL) participated in an H(2) (15)O-PET study in which they generated action pantomimes or ASL verbs in response to pictures of tools and manipulable objects. For pantomime generation, participants were instructed to "show how you would use the object." For verb generation, signers were asked to "generate a verb related to the object." The objects for this condition were selected to elicit handling verbs that resemble pantomime (e.g., TO-HAMMER (hand configuration and movement mimic the act of hammering) and non-handling verbs that do not (e.g., POUR-SYRUP, produced with a "Y" handshape). For the baseline task, participants viewed pictures of manipulable objects and an occasional non-manipulable object and decided whether the objects could be handled, gesturing "yes" (thumbs up) or "no" (hand wave). Relative to baseline, generation of ASL verbs engaged left inferior frontal cortex, but when non-signers produced pantomimes for the same objects, no frontal activation was observed. Both groups recruited left parietal cortex during pantomime production. However, for deaf signers the activation was more extensive and bilateral, which may reflect a more complex and integrated neural representation of hand actions. We conclude that the production of pantomime versus ASL verbs (even those that resemble pantomime) engage partially segregated neural systems that support praxic versus linguistic functions.
Figures



Similar articles
-
CNS activation and regional connectivity during pantomime observation: no engagement of the mirror neuron system for deaf signers.Neuroimage. 2010 Jan 1;49(1):994-1005. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.08.001. Epub 2009 Aug 11. Neuroimage. 2010. PMID: 19679192 Free PMC article.
-
Motor-iconicity of sign language does not alter the neural systems underlying tool and action naming.Brain Lang. 2004 Apr;89(1):27-37. doi: 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00309-2. Brain Lang. 2004. PMID: 15010234
-
Mental rotation within linguistic and non-linguistic domains in users of American sign language.Cognition. 1998 Sep;68(3):221-46. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(98)00054-7. Cognition. 1998. PMID: 9852666
-
Neural systems for sign language production: mechanisms supporting lexical selection, phonological encoding, and articulation.Hum Brain Mapp. 2004 Nov;23(3):156-67. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20054. Hum Brain Mapp. 2004. PMID: 15449359 Free PMC article.
-
Neural Activity During Mental Rotation in Deaf Signers: The Influence of Long-Term Sign Language Experience.Ear Hear. 2018 Sep/Oct;39(5):1015-1024. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000540. Ear Hear. 2018. PMID: 29298164
Cited by
-
Disentangling Pantomime From Early Sign in a New Sign Language: Window Into Language Evolution Research.Front Psychol. 2021 Apr 14;12:640057. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.640057. eCollection 2021. Front Psychol. 2021. PMID: 33935890 Free PMC article.
-
New Perspectives on the Neurobiology of Sign Languages.Front Commun (Lausanne). 2021 Dec;6:748430. doi: 10.3389/fcomm.2021.748430. Epub 2021 Dec 13. Front Commun (Lausanne). 2021. PMID: 36381199 Free PMC article.
-
Towards a new neurobiology of language.J Neurosci. 2012 Oct 10;32(41):14125-31. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3244-12.2012. J Neurosci. 2012. PMID: 23055482 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A normative model of brain responses to social scenarios reflects the maturity of children and adolescents' social-emotional abilities.Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2023 Nov 15;18(1):nsad062. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsad062. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2023. PMID: 37930841 Free PMC article.
-
Sign Language: How the Brain Represents Phonology without Sound.Curr Biol. 2020 Nov 16;30(22):R1361-R1363. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2020.09.017. Curr Biol. 2020. PMID: 33202232 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Benedicto E, Brentari D. Where did all the arguments go?: Argument-changing properties of classifiers in ASL. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory. 2004;22(4):743–810.
-
- Braun AR, Guillemin A, Hosey L, Varga M. The neural organization of discourse - An (H2O)-O-15-PET study of narrative production in English and American sign language. Brain. 2001;124:2028–2044. - PubMed
-
- Buckner RL, Raichle ME, Petersen SE. Dissociation of human prefrontal cortical areas across different speech production tasks and gender groups. J Neurophysiol. 1995;74(5):2163–2173. - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources