Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Sep 1:2:196.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00196. eCollection 2011.

Best practices for allocating appropriate credit and responsibility to authors of multi-authored articles

Lucas D Eggert  1
Affiliations

Best practices for allocating appropriate credit and responsibility to authors of multi-authored articles

Lucas D Eggert. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Working in multidisciplinary teams has become a common feature of modern research processes. This situation inevitably leads to the question of how to decide on who to acknowledge as authors of a multi-authored publication. The question is gaining pertinence, since individual scientists' publication records are playing an increasingly important role in their professional success. At worst, discussions about authorship allocation might lead to a serious conflict among coworkers that could even endanger the successful completion of a whole research project. Surprisingly, there does not seem to be any discussion on the issue of ethical standards for authorship is the field of Cognitive Science at the moment. In this short review I address the problem by characterizing modern challenges to a fair system for allocating authorship. I also offer a list of best practice principles and recommendations for determining authors in multi-authored publications on the basis of a review of existing standards.

Keywords: authorship; contributorship; responsible conduct of research; scientific publishing.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Afifi M. M. (2004). Authorship. Credit and disputes. Saudi Med. J. 25, 1742–1743 - PubMed
    1. Ahmed S. M., Maurana C. A., Engle J. A., Uddin D. E., Glaus K. D. (1997). A method for assigning authorship in multiauthored publications. Fam. Med. 29, 42–44 - PubMed
    1. Albert T., Wager E. (2003). How to Handle Authorship Disputes: A Guide For New Researchers. The COPE Report 2003 (July 1). Available at: http://www.publicationethics.org/resources/guidelines
    1. Altman D. G., Goodman S. N., Schroter S. (2002). How statistical expertise is used in medical research. JAMA 287, 2817–2820 10.1001/jama.287.21.2765 - DOI - PubMed
    1. American Medical Association (2011). JAMA Authorship Responsibility, Conflicts of Interest and Funding, and Copyright Transfer/Publishing Agreement. Available at: http://jam a.ama-assn.org/site/misc/ifora.xhtml#AuthorshipCriteriaandCon... [accessed July 30, 2011].

LinkOut - more resources