[Reconstruction of the middle ear with passive implants]
- PMID: 21909771
- DOI: 10.1007/s00106-011-2366-0
[Reconstruction of the middle ear with passive implants]
Abstract
Today the middle ear can be reconstructed in various ways: without any ossicular chain reconstruction, with reconstruction using autologous ossicles, with reconstruction using passive alloplastic implants or by using active implants. In recent decades, reconstruction with passive middle ear implants has increased for several reasons. It has been demonstrated that in the case of inflamed mucosa the resorption rate of autologous ossicles is around 15%. Modern alloplastic implants can be considered more resistant to inflammatory processes with high biocompatibility. Furthermore, modern alloplastic implants are low-weight with high rigidity. The greatest advantage lies in better coupling possibilities to the residual ossicular chain because of the introduction of coupling elements and also functional elements which are integrated into the prostheses. Due to the wide variety of passive implants this paper is intended to provide an overview of the best reconstruction solutions for the most typical ossicular chain defects using passive middle ear implants. Particular attention is paid to the use of alloplastic prosthesis compared to the use of autologous ossicles.
Similar articles
-
[Reconstruction of the ossicular chain--current strategies].Laryngorhinootologie. 2010 Mar;89(3):172-81; quiz 182-3. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1248308. Epub 2010 Mar 17. Laryngorhinootologie. 2010. PMID: 20238289 German.
-
[Passive and active middle ear implants].Laryngorhinootologie. 2009 May;88 Suppl 1:S32-47. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1119493. Epub 2009 Apr 7. Laryngorhinootologie. 2009. PMID: 19353457 Review. German.
-
[Results after rebuilding the ossicular chain using the autogenous incus, ionomer-cement-and titanium implants (tympanoplasty type III)].Laryngorhinootologie. 2002 Mar;81(3):164-70. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-25031. Laryngorhinootologie. 2002. PMID: 11967767 German.
-
A comparison of PORP, TORP, and incus homograft for ossicular reconstruction in chronic ear surgery.Laryngoscope. 1986 Feb;96(2):159-65. doi: 10.1288/00005537-198602000-00006. Laryngoscope. 1986. PMID: 3753735
-
Porps, torps, and homografts in tympanoplasty.J Otolaryngol. 1980 Apr;9(2):169-76. J Otolaryngol. 1980. PMID: 6990013 Review.
Cited by
-
Identification of risk factors for residual cholesteatoma in children and adults: a retrospective study on 110 cases of revision surgery.Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Mar-Apr;86(2):201-208. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2018.11.004. Epub 2018 Dec 31. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2020. PMID: 31523024 Free PMC article.
-
[Quality control following reconstructive middle ear surgery: from bench to bedside].HNO. 2013 Dec;61(12):1011-6. doi: 10.1007/s00106-013-2777-1. HNO. 2013. PMID: 24327195 German.
-
Visualisation of passive middle ear implants by cone beam and multi-detector computed tomography: a comparative in vitro study.Eur Radiol. 2016 Dec;26(12):4538-4544. doi: 10.1007/s00330-016-4312-8. Epub 2016 Mar 30. Eur Radiol. 2016. PMID: 27027315
-
[From reconstruction to function : Hands-on training in tympanoplasty using real-time feedback].HNO. 2021 Jul;69(7):556-561. doi: 10.1007/s00106-020-00941-x. Epub 2020 Sep 10. HNO. 2021. PMID: 32910259 Free PMC article. German.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical