Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2011 Dec;21(12):1958-64.
doi: 10.1007/s11695-011-0520-0.

Linear stapler technique may be safer than circular in gastrojejunal anastomosis for laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a meta-analysis of comparative studies

Affiliations
Review

Linear stapler technique may be safer than circular in gastrojejunal anastomosis for laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a meta-analysis of comparative studies

Salvatore Giordano et al. Obes Surg. 2011 Dec.

Abstract

The technique of choice for gastrojejunostomy (GJ) during laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) for morbid obesity is controversial. We performed a meta-analysis comparing linear versus circular stapler technique to evaluate this issue. A systematic literature search was performed. Primary outcomes were gastrojejunal leak and stricture. Secondary outcomes were operative time, length of hospital stay, post-operative bleeding, wound infection, marginal ulcers and estimated weight loss. Eight studies involving 1,321 patients were retrieved and included in the present study. A significantly decreased risk of GJ stricture was observed after using linear versus circular stapler (RR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.12-0.93; p = 0.04). Wound infection risk (RR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.22-0.67; p = 0.0008) and operative time (MD, -24.18; 95% CI, -35.31, -13.05; p < 0.0001) were significantly reduced by using linear stapling. No significant differences were observed in the other outcome end-points. The use of the linear stapler compared with circular stapler for GJ during LRYGB for morbid obesity may be associated with a reduced risk of anastomosis stricture and wound infection, as well as with a shorter operative time.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Obes Surg. 1998 Jun;8(3):289-95 - PubMed
    1. Obes Surg. 2002 Oct;12(5):639-42 - PubMed
    1. JSLS. 2009 Jul-Sep;13(3):306-11 - PubMed
    1. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2006 Jan-Feb;2(1):11-6 - PubMed
    1. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2008 Mar-Apr;4(2):166-72; discussion 172-3 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources