Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Sep-Oct;31(5):488-93.
doi: 10.4103/0256-4947.84626.

Pattern of craniofacial anomalies seen in a tertiary care hospital in Saudi Arabia

Affiliations

Pattern of craniofacial anomalies seen in a tertiary care hospital in Saudi Arabia

Aljohar Aziza et al. Ann Saudi Med. 2011 Sep-Oct.

Abstract

Background and objective: To date, there are no published studies from Saudi Arabia on the incidence or etiology of craniofacial anomalies. This study aimed to report the patterns of craniofacial anomalies in Saudi Arabia.

Design and setting: Hospital-based, descriptive study conducted during 2002 to 2009 in the Cleft Lip/Palate and Craniofacial Anomalies Registry at King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Patients and methods: Data was collected on craniofacial patients in the registry.

Results: Of the 447 craniofacial patients (male, 242; female, 205), 109 (24.4%) had only cranial anomalies, 261 (58.4%) had only facial anomalies and 77 (17.2%) had both of these conditions. Craniosynostosis was seen in 33.3% of the total patients (81 males and 68 females). Of the 65 craniosynostosis syndromic patients, 25 (38.5%) had Apert syndrome and 18 (27.7%) had Crouzon syndrome. Among facial anomalies, 47 (19.4%) had dysmorphic features, followed by 35 (14.5%) with micrognathia. Among facial syndromes, 72 (59.0%) were observed to have Pierre-Robin sequence, 17 (13.9%) had Goldenhar syndrome and another 17 (13.9%) had Van der Woude syndrome. Cleft palate was more common in 171 (56.8%) patients as an associated deformity, followed by cleft lip with cleft palate in 99 (32.9%) and cleft lip in 23 (7.6%) patients. Of the 224 patients having other congenital anomalies, the cardiovascular system was most commonly affected, with 46 (20.5%) children diagnosed with congenital heart disease. A family history of anomalies was observed more in children born to parents of a consanguineous marriage than in those whose parents were unrelated (P=.01).

Conclusions: Additional efforts should be made towards creating awareness among the general population about these deformities in relation to consanguinity.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. WHO 2001. Global strategies to reduce the health-care burden of craniofacial anomalies: report of WHO Meetings on International Collaborative Research on Craniofacial Anomalies, Geneva, Switzerland, 5-8 November 2000; Park City, Utah, U. S. A., 24-26 May 2001 - PubMed
    1. Global registry and database on craniofacial anomalies: Report of a WHO Registry Meeting on Craniofacial Anomalies WHO Registry Meeting on Craniofacial Anomalies. Bauru, Brazil: 2001. WHO 2001.
    1. Fida NM, Al-Aama J, Nichols W, Nichols W, Alqahtani M. A prospective study of congenital malformations among live born neonates at a University Hospital in Western Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J. 2007;28:1367–73. - PubMed
    1. Sallout BI, Al-Hoshan MS, Attyyaa RA, Al Suleimat AA. Antenatal diagnosis, prevalence and outcome of major congenital anomalies in Saudi Arabia: A hospital-based study. Ann Saudi Med. 2008;28:272–6. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Al Hosani H, Salah M, Abu-Zeid H, Farag HM, Saade D. The National Congenital Anomalies Register in the United Arab Emirates. East Mediterr Health J. 2005;11:690–9. - PubMed