Assessment of the reliability of endothelial cell-density estimates in the presence of pseudoguttata
- PMID: 21912904
- DOI: 10.1007/s00417-011-1812-8
Assessment of the reliability of endothelial cell-density estimates in the presence of pseudoguttata
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this work is to assess the reliability of endothelial cell-density (ECD) estimates in corneas with different severity pseudoguttata.
Methods: Specular microscopy was undertaken on grade 1, 2, or 3 pseudoguttata patients and age-matched controls aged 52-83 years. On high magnification prints of central cornea, areas of complete cells (all sides visible) and partial 'cells' (one or more sides obscured) were measured manually. Sets of 45 complete cells were selected, as well as 75 cells that were a mixture of complete and partial cells on guttate endothelia. ECD was calculated by a progressive averaging technique.
Results: Each group comprised 12 patients with similar range of ECD values (1,230-4,587 cells/mm(2)). Based on 40 complete cells, ECD could be estimated to within ±3.1% for grade 3 pseudoguttata versus ±2.0% for controls. If a mixture of complete and partial cells were measured, ECD could be estimated to within ±2.8% for grade 3 pseudoguttata images (n = 70 cells) and ±1.1% for controls. The estimated variability increases to substantial levels of ±20% if only ten cells were measured. No statistical differences in ECD were noted between guttate and normal endothelia if only complete cells were measured, but could be different if partial 'cells' were included.
Conclusions: Providing adequate numbers of complete cells are measured and in the absence of obvious polymegathism, ECD estimates can be made to within around ±3% in the presence of typical but significant pseudoguttata.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of manual & automated analysis methods for corneal endothelial cell density measurements by specular microscopy.J Optom. 2018 Jul-Sep;11(3):182-191. doi: 10.1016/j.optom.2017.06.001. Epub 2017 Aug 7. J Optom. 2018. PMID: 28797649 Free PMC article.
-
Further Analysis of the Predictability of Corneal Endothelial Cell Density Estimates When Polymegethism Is Present.Cornea. 2017 Aug;36(8):973-979. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001218. Cornea. 2017. PMID: 28614153
-
Clinical evaluation of cornea pseudoguttata.Br J Ophthalmol. 2007 Jan;91(1):22-5. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2006.102624. Epub 2006 Sep 14. Br J Ophthalmol. 2007. PMID: 16973660 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of the Center and Flex-Center Methods of Corneal Endothelial Cell Analysis in the Presence of Guttae.Cornea. 2017 Dec;36(12):1514-1520. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001334. Cornea. 2017. PMID: 28834820
-
Comparison of Noncontact Specular and Confocal Microscopy for Evaluation of Corneal Endothelium.Eye Contact Lens. 2018 Sep;44 Suppl 1:S144-S150. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000362. Eye Contact Lens. 2018. PMID: 28346276
Cited by
-
Diagnosis and Management of Pseudoguttata: A Literature Review.Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol. 2019 Fall;8(3):156-162. Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol. 2019. PMID: 31598518 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Assessment of a variable frame (polygonal) method to estimate corneal endothelial cell counts after corneal transplantation.Eye (Lond). 2012 Jun;26(6):803-9. doi: 10.1038/eye.2012.42. Epub 2012 Mar 23. Eye (Lond). 2012. PMID: 22441023 Free PMC article.
-
Automated segmentation of the corneal endothelium in a large set of 'real-world' specular microscopy images using the U-Net architecture.Sci Rep. 2019 Mar 18;9(1):4752. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-41034-2. Sci Rep. 2019. PMID: 30894636 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of manual & automated analysis methods for corneal endothelial cell density measurements by specular microscopy.J Optom. 2018 Jul-Sep;11(3):182-191. doi: 10.1016/j.optom.2017.06.001. Epub 2017 Aug 7. J Optom. 2018. PMID: 28797649 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical