Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2011 Dec;11(6):533-42.
doi: 10.1007/s11892-011-0223-x.

Genetics of the HLA region in the prediction of type 1 diabetes

Affiliations
Review

Genetics of the HLA region in the prediction of type 1 diabetes

Janelle A Noble et al. Curr Diab Rep. 2011 Dec.

Abstract

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is one of the most widely studied complex genetic disorders, and the genes in HLA are reported to account for approximately 40-50% of the familial aggregation of T1D. The major genetic determinants of this disease are polymorphisms of class II HLA genes encoding DQ and DR. The DR-DQ haplotypes conferring the highest risk are DRB1*03:01-DQA1*05:01-DQB1*02:01 (abbreviated "DR3") and DRB1*04:01/02/04/05/08-DQA1*03:01-DQB1*03:02/04 (or DQB1*02; abbreviated "DR4"). The risk is much higher for the heterozygote formed by these two haplotypes (OR = 16.59; 95% CI, 13.7-20.1) than for either of the homozygotes (DR3/DR3, OR = 6.32; 95% CI, 5.12-7.80; DR4/DR4, OR = 5.68; 95% CI, 3.91). In addition, some haplotypes confer strong protection from disease, such as DRB1*15:01-DQA1*01:02-DQB1*06:02 (abbreviated "DR2"; OR = 0.03; 95% CI, 0.01-0.07). After adjusting for the genetic correlation with DR and DQ, significant associations can be seen for HLA class II DPB1 alleles, in particular, DPB1*04:02, DPB1*03:01, and DPB1*02:02. Outside of the class II region, the strongest susceptibility is conferred by class I allele B*39:06 (OR =10.31; 95% CI, 4.21-25.1) and other HLA-B alleles. In addition, several loci in the class III region are reported to be associated with T1D, as are some loci telomeric to class I. Not surprisingly, current approaches for the prediction of T1D in screening studies take advantage of genotyping HLA-DR and HLA-DQ loci, which is then combined with family history and screening for autoantibodies directed against islet-cell antigens. Inclusion of additional moderate HLA risk haplotypes may help identify the majority of children with T1D before the onset of the disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure

No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic map of the HLA region showing genes reported to be associated with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Map positions to chromosome 6 are from HapMap Rel 28 NCBI B36. Asterisk (*) indicates the signal maps to a 500-kb region between the UBD gene and the MAS1L gene also comprising several other genes [58].
Figure 2
Figure 2
Forest plot showing study-specific estimates for the association between the HLA class II DR3/DR4 genotype and type 1 diabetes (T1D). DR3 = DRB1*03:01-DQA1*05:01-DQB1*02. DR4 = DRB1*04:01/02/04/05/08-DQA1*03:01-DQB1*03:02/04 (or DQB1*02). Total sample size = 5130 T1D cases and 6366 controls from 14 studies. P = 6 × 10[−293] (fixed effects meta-analysis). No significant interstudy heterogeneity was observed: I2 = 13% p(Cochran’s Q) < 0.3 (see [55] for a description of the meta-analysis methods). Case and control genotype counts were derived from the following published studies: Sardinia [65] T1D = 1052, controls = 1917; Italy [66] T1D = 134, controls = 128; USA-HBDI collection [9] T1D = 283, controls = 199; USA-DAISY collection [6263] T1D = 837, controls = 115; United Kingdom [10] T1D = 753, controls = 753; Sweden [67] T1D = 628, controls = 501; Finland [68] T1D = 622, controls = 622; Hungary [69] T1D = 149, controls = 177; Slovenia [70] T1D = 171, controls = 117; Turkey [71] T1D = 178, controls = 248; Hong Kong [72] T1D = 76, controls = 250; Singapore [71, 73] T1D = 73, controls = 80; Philippines [74] T1D = 90, controls 191; USA Mexican American [75] T1D = 84, controls = 68; For the non-Caucasian studies the control genotype counts were zero, the frequency in controls was estimated as ½ × number of controls. See Thomson et al. [12] for details on study selection criteria. DAISY—Diabetes Autoimmunity in the Young; HBDI—Human Biological Data Interchange.

References

    1. Eisenbarth GS. Banting Lecture2009: An unfinished journey: molecular pathogenesis to prevention of type 1A diabetes. Diabetes. 2010;59:759–774. This lecture gives an excellent overview of T1D pathogenesis important to the understanding of the genetic susceptibility.

    1. Dunger DB, Sperling MA, Acerini CL, Bohn DJ, Daneman D, Danne TP, Glaser NS, Hanas R, Hintz RL, Levitsky LL, Savage MO, Tasker RC, Wolfsdorf JI. European Society for Paediatric Endocrinology/Lawson Wilkins Pediatric Endocrine Society consensus statement on diabetic ketoacidosis in children and adolescents. Pediatrics. 2004;113:e133–e140. - PubMed
    1. Maahs DM, West NA, Lawrence JM, Mayer-Davis EJ. Epidemiology of type 1 diabetes. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2010;39:481–497. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Karvonen M, Viik-Kajander M, Moltchanova E, Libman I, LaPorte R, Tuomilehto J. Incidence of childhood type 1 diabetes worldwide. Diabetes Mondiale (DiaMond) Project Group. Diabetes Care. 2000;23:1516–1526. - PubMed
    1. Dabelea D, Bell RA, D'Agostino RB, Jr, Imperatore G, Johansen JM, Linder B, Liu LL, Loots B, Marcovina S, Mayer-Davis EJ, Pettitt DJ, Waitzfelder B. Incidence of diabetes in youth in the United States. Jama. 2007;297:2716–2724. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances