Traces: making sense of urodynamics testing--Part 6: Evaluation of bladder filling/ storage: bladder wall compliance and the detrusor leak point pressure
- PMID: 21913595
Traces: making sense of urodynamics testing--Part 6: Evaluation of bladder filling/ storage: bladder wall compliance and the detrusor leak point pressure
Abstract
This article defines the concept of bladder wall compliance, discusses various means of measuring or assessing compliance, and reviews its clinical relevance. Based on existing evidence, low bladder wall compliance is attributable to increased detrusor muscle tone during bladder filling or changes in the viscoelastic properties of the bladder wall that impede the bladder wall's ability to stretch. While one can identify the individual components that compromise compliance, the filling CMG is only able to detect whole bladder wall compliance (for example, the combined effects of increased detrusor muscle tone and compromised viscoelastic properties of the bladder wall). From a clinical perspective, whole bladder wall compliance is divided into two categories: normal and low. Low bladder wall compliance is clinically relevant because of its potential to produce upper urinary tract distress, and there is increased risk for febrile urinary tract infections, ureterohydronephrosis, vesicoureteral reflux, renal scarring, compromised urinary tract function, and urinary incontinence because of its direct influence on the bladder outlet. It may produce pain and pressure in the patient with preserved sensations of bladder filling. Low bladder wall compliance is associated with a variety of clinically relevant disorders, including neurogenic bladder dysfunction, pelvic irradiation, interstitial cystitis, and radical prostatectomy.
Similar articles
-
Traces: making sense of urodynamics testing--Part 9: Evaluation of sensations detrusor response to bladder filling.Urol Nurs. 2012 Jan-Feb;32(1):21-8, 18. Urol Nurs. 2012. PMID: 22474862 Review.
-
Traces: making sense of urodynamics testing--Part 5: evaluation of bladder filling/storage functions.Urol Nurs. 2011 May-Jun;31(3):149-53. Urol Nurs. 2011. PMID: 21805752
-
Traces: making sense of urodynamics testing--Part 8: Evaluating sensations of bladder filling.Urol Nurs. 2011 Nov-Dec;31(6):369-74. Urol Nurs. 2011. PMID: 22268249 Review.
-
Traces: making sense of urodynamics testing--Part 10: evaluation of micturition via the voiding pressure-flow study.Urol Nurs. 2012 Mar-Apr;32(2):71-8. Urol Nurs. 2012. PMID: 22690462 Review.
-
Traces: making sense of urodynamics testing--part 7: Evaluation of bladder filling/storage: Evaluation of urethral sphincter incompetence and stress urinary incontinence.Urol Nurs. 2011 Sep-Oct;31(5):267-77, 289. Urol Nurs. 2011. PMID: 22081833 Review.
Cited by
-
A Feasibility Study to Determine Whether Clinical Contrast Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging can Detect Increased Bladder Permeability in Patients with Interstitial Cystitis.J Urol. 2016 Mar;195(3):631-8. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.08.077. Epub 2015 Aug 22. J Urol. 2016. PMID: 26307161 Free PMC article.
-
Assessment of colon and bladder crosstalk in an experimental colitis model using contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015 Nov;27(11):1571-9. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12654. Epub 2015 Aug 24. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015. PMID: 26303228 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical