Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Sep 13:11:699.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-699.

Health care for immigrants in Europe: is there still consensus among country experts about principles of good practice? A Delphi study

Affiliations

Health care for immigrants in Europe: is there still consensus among country experts about principles of good practice? A Delphi study

Walter Devillé et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: European Member States are facing a challenge to provide accessible and effective health care services for immigrants. It remains unclear how best to achieve this and what characterises good practice in increasingly multicultural societies across Europe. This study assessed the views and values of professionals working in different health care contexts and in different European countries as to what constitutes good practice in health care for immigrants.

Methods: A total of 134 experts in 16 EU Member States participated in a three-round Delphi process. The experts represented four different fields: academia, Non-Governmental Organisations, policy-making and health care practice. For each country, the process aimed to produce a national consensus list of the most important factors characterising good practice in health care for migrants.

Results: The scoring procedures resulted in 10 to 16 factors being identified as the most important for each participating country. All 186 factors were aggregated into 9 themes: (1) easy and equal access to health care, (2) empowerment of migrants, (3) culturally sensitive health care services, (4) quality of care, (5) patient/health care provider communication, (6) respect towards migrants, (7) networking in and outside health services, (8) targeted outreach activities, and (9) availability of data about specificities in migrant health care and prevention. Although local political debate, level of immigration and the nature of local health care systems influenced the selection and rating of factors within each country, there was a broad European consensus on most factors. Yet, discordance remained both within countries, e.g. on the need for prioritising cultural differences, and between countries, e.g. on the need for more consistent governance of health care services for immigrants.

Conclusions: Experts across Europe asserted the right to culturally sensitive health care for all immigrants. There is a broad consensus among experts about the major principles of good practice that need to be implemented across Europe. However, there also is some disagreement both within and between countries on specific issues that require further research and debate.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. WHO. Health of Migrants - The way forward. Report of a global consultation. Madrid, Spain, 3-5 March 2010. 2010.
    1. OECD. International Migration Outlook. 2010.
    1. International Organization for Migration. World Migration Report: Managing Labour Mobility in the Evolving Global Economy. Geneva. 2008.
    1. UNCHR. The Right to Health. Factsheet 31. OHCHR-WHO; 2008. http://www2.ohchr.org/english/issues/health/right/ accessed on 22/01/2011.
    1. Cooper H, Smaje C, Arber S. Use of health services by children and young people according to ethnicity and social class: secondary analysis of a national survey. BMJ. 1998;317:1047–1051. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types