Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2012 Feb;27(2):196-201.
doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1875-6. Epub 2011 Sep 16.

Provision of contraceptive services to women with diabetes mellitus

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Provision of contraceptive services to women with diabetes mellitus

Eleanor Bimla Schwarz et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Women with diabetes mellitus who delay pregnancy until glycemic control is achieved experience lower rates of adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Objective: To compare rates of provision of contraceptive services among women with diabetes mellitus and women without chronic medical conditions.

Design: A retrospective cohort study of 459,181 women aged 15-44 who had continuous membership and pharmacy benefits in a managed care organization in Northern California between January 2006 and June 2007. Rates of documented provision of contraceptive counseling, prescriptions, and services were compared between women with diabetes and women without chronic medical conditions.

Results: Among 8,182 women with diabetes and 122,921 women without any chronic conditions, women with diabetes were less likely than women without a chronic condition to have documented receipt of any contraceptive counseling, prescriptions, or services (47.8% vs 62.0%, p < 0.001). After controlling for age and race, women with diabetes were more likely to have undergone tubal sterilization compared to women without a chronic condition (OR = 1.41, 95% CI 1.30-1.54), but less likely to have received highly effective, reversible methods of contraception such as intrauterine contraception (OR = 0.68, 95% CI 0.61-0.75). In addition, more women with diabetes had undergone hysterectomy, which is rarely performed solely for contraceptive purposes.

Conclusions: Women with diabetes were less likely to receive highly effective reversible contraception and more likely to undergo sterilization procedures. Increasing the use of highly effective reversible contraceptives may help diabetic women who want to retain their fertility to delay pregnancy until glycemic control is achieved.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

  • Patterns of contraception in UK women with Type 1 diabetes mellitus: a GP database study.
    Lawrenson RA, Leydon GM, Williams TJ, Newson RB, Feher MD. Lawrenson RA, et al. Diabet Med. 1999 May;16(5):395-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-5491.1999.00074.x. Diabet Med. 1999. PMID: 10342339
  • Canadian Contraception Consensus (Part 1 of 4).
    Black A, Guilbert E; Co-Authors; Costescu D, Dunn S, Fisher W, Kives S, Mirosh M, Norman WV, Pymar H, Reid R, Roy G, Varto H, Waddington A, Wagner MS, Whelan AM; Special Contributors; Ferguson C, Fortin C, Kielly M, Mansouri S, Todd N; Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. Black A, et al. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015 Oct;37(10):936-42. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30033-0. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015. PMID: 26606712 English, French.
  • Canadian Contraception Consensus (Part 2 of 4).
    Black A, Guilbert E; Co-Authors; Costescu D, Dunn S, Fisher W, Kives S, Mirosh M, Norman WV, Pymar H, Reid R, Roy G, Varto H, Waddington A, Wagner MS, Whelan AM; Special Contributors; Ferguson C, Fortin C, Kielly M, Mansouri S, Todd N. Black A, et al. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015 Nov;37(11):1033-9. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30054-8. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015. PMID: 26629725 English, French.
  • Trends in contraception and sterilization in Australia.
    Santow G. Santow G. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1991 Aug;31(3):201-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828x.1991.tb02781.x. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1991. PMID: 1804078
  • Diabetes mellitus and fertility control: contraception management issues.
    Mestman JH, Schmidt-Sarosi C. Mestman JH, et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Jun;168(6 Pt 2):2012-20. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(12)90943-6. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993. PMID: 8512046 Review.

Cited by

References

    1. Kinsley B. Achieving better outcomes in pregnancies complicated by type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Clin Ther. 2007;29(Suppl D):S153–S160. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.12.015. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Willhoite MB, Bennert HW, Jr, Palomaki GE, Zaremba MM, Herman WH, Williams JR, et al. The impact of preconception counseling on pregnancy outcomes. The experience of the Maine Diabetes in Pregnancy Program. Diabetes Care. 1993;16(2):450–455. doi: 10.2337/diacare.16.2.450. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Finer LB, Henshaw SK. Disparities in rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States, 1994 and 2001. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2006;38(2):90–96. doi: 10.1363/3809006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schwarz EB, Maselli J, Gonzales R. Contraceptive counseling of diabetic women of reproductive age. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107(5):1070–1074. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000216002.36799.b4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chuang CH, Chase GA, Bensyl DM, Weisman CS. Contraceptive use by diabetic and obese women. Womens Health Issues. 2005;15(4):167–173. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2005.04.002. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types