Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Oct;33(10):2477-86.
doi: 10.1002/hbm.21383. Epub 2011 Sep 16.

The role of the left posterior parietal lobule in top-down modulation on space-based attention: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study

Affiliations

The role of the left posterior parietal lobule in top-down modulation on space-based attention: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study

Xiaoming Du et al. Hum Brain Mapp. 2012 Oct.

Abstract

Converging evidence from neuroimaging as well as lesion and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) studies has been obtained for the involvement of right ventral posterior parietal cortex (PPC) in exogenous orienting. However, the contribution of dorsal PPC to attentional orienting, particularly endogenous orienting, is still under debate. In an informative peripheral cueing paradigm, in which the exogenous and endogenous orienting can be studied in relative isolation within a single task, we applied TMS over sub-regions of dorsal PPC to explore their possible distinct involvement in exogenous and endogenous processes. We found that disruption of the left posterior intraparietal sulcus (pIPS) weakened the attentional effects of endogenous orienting, but did not affect exogenous processes. In addition, TMS applied over the right superior parietal lobule (SPL) resulted in an overall increase in reaction times. The present study provides the causal evidence that the left pIPS plays a crucial role in voluntary orienting of visual attention, while right SPL is involved in the processing of arousal and/or vigilance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic depiction of the stimuli and procedure
Figure 2
Figure 2
Results of Experiment 1. A: Mean reaction times for valid, intra, and inter conditions under both high and low cue validity. B: SAE and OAE under different cue validity conditions. Error bars indicate SEMs. “*” indicates P < 0.05 and “n.s.” indicates P > 0.05.
Figure 3
Figure 3
TMS sites relative to individual magnetic resonance images of one subject as extrapolated using a frameless stereotaxic system.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Results of Experiment 2. A: Mean reaction times for valid, intra, and inter conditions in left‐parietal stimulation group. B, C: SAE and OAE for left SPL stimulation, left pIPS stimulation, and no‐TMS condition. D: Mean reaction times for valid, intra, and inter conditions in right‐parietal stimulation group. E, F: SAE and OAE for right SPL stimulation, right pIPS stimulation, and no‐TMS condition. Error bars indicate SEMs. “*” indicates P < 0.05 and “n.s.” indicates P > 0.05.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abrams RA, Law MB ( 2000): Object‐based visual attention with endogenous orienting. Percept Psychophys 62: 818–833. - PubMed
    1. Arrington CM, Carr TH, Mayer AR, Rao SM ( 2000): Neural mechanisms of visual attention: Object‐based selection of a region in space. J Cogn Neurosci 12: 106–117. - PubMed
    1. Ashbridge E, Walsh V, Cowey A ( 1997): Temporal aspects of visual search studied by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neuropsychologia 35: 1121–1131. - PubMed
    1. Bartolomeo P, Chokron S ( 2001): Unilateral neglect: The effect of competing stimuli on estimated line length. Brain Cogn 46: 34–38. - PubMed
    1. Bartolomeo P, Chokron S ( 2002): Orienting of attention in left unilateral neglect. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 26: 217–234. - PubMed