Economic evaluation of chlorhexidine-impregnated sponges for preventing catheter-related infections in critically ill adults in the Dressing Study
- PMID: 21926570
- DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31822f0604
Economic evaluation of chlorhexidine-impregnated sponges for preventing catheter-related infections in critically ill adults in the Dressing Study
Abstract
Background: The randomized two-way factorial Dressing Study (1,636 patients, 28,931 catheter days) showed that a chlorhexidine-impregnated sponge decreased the incidence of major catheter-related infections from 1.4‰ to 0.6‰ catheter days, and that scheduled dressing changes every 7 days was not inferior to scheduled changes every 3 days. Here, we assessed the cost benefits of chlorhexidine-impregnated sponge use.
Methods: Costs directly related to major catheter-related infections and the costs of chlorhexidine-impregnated sponge and contact dermatitis were calculated prospectively using microcosting methods during the original study. The added length of stay in the intensive care unit due to major catheter-related infection was estimated using the disability model and assuming a cost of $2,118/intensive care unit day. The cost of each strategy was estimated based on all costs and on the probability of major catheter-related infection according to the Dressing Study results.
Interventions: None.
Results: Median direct cost of major catheter-related infection was $792. Estimated added length of stay due to major catheter-related infection was 11 days (95% confidence interval [-2 days; 26 days]). Overall cost of major catheter-related infection was $24,090/episode. Each dressing cost $9.08 (146 observations) and each chlorhexidine-impregnated sponge cost $9.73. Assuming a baseline major catheter-related infection incidence of 1.4‰ catheter days, chlorhexidine-impregnated sponge use saved $197 per patient with the 3-day chlorhexidine-impregnated sponge dressing change strategy, and $83 with the 7-day standard dressing change strategy. Chlorhexidine-impregnated sponge use remained cost saving assuming a baseline major catheter-related infection incidence as low as 0.35‰ catheter days, or an overall cost per major catheter-related infections of up to $4,400.
Conclusion: Chlorhexidine-impregnated sponge for arterial and central venous catheters saves money by preventing major catheter-related infections, even in intensive care units with low baseline major catheter-related infection levels.
Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov number, NCT00417235.
Comment in
-
Chlorhexidine-impregnated intravascular catheter sponge dressings: an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.Crit Care Med. 2012 Jan;40(1):296-8. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318232d2f3. Crit Care Med. 2012. PMID: 22179345 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of Oligon catheters and chlorhexidine-impregnated sponges with standard multilumen central venous catheters for prevention of associated colonization and infections in intensive care unit patients: a multicenter, randomized, controlled study.Crit Care Med. 2012 Feb;40(2):420-9. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31822f0d4b. Crit Care Med. 2012. PMID: 21926583 Clinical Trial.
-
Chlorhexidine-impregnated sponges and less frequent dressing changes for prevention of catheter-related infections in critically ill adults: a randomized controlled trial.JAMA. 2009 Mar 25;301(12):1231-41. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.376. JAMA. 2009. PMID: 19318651 Clinical Trial.
-
Evaluating central venous catheter care in a pediatric intensive care unit.Am J Crit Care. 2009 Nov;18(6):514-20; quiz 521. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2009168. Am J Crit Care. 2009. PMID: 19880953
-
Use of chlorhexidine-impregnated dressing to prevent vascular and epidural catheter colonization and infection: a meta-analysis.J Antimicrob Chemother. 2006 Aug;58(2):281-7. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkl234. Epub 2006 Jun 6. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2006. PMID: 16757502 Review.
-
Types of urethral catheters for management of short-term voiding problems in hospitalized adults: a short version Cochrane review.Neurourol Urodyn. 2008;27(8):738-46. doi: 10.1002/nau.20645. Neurourol Urodyn. 2008. PMID: 18951451 Review.
Cited by
-
What's new in catheter-related infection: skin cleansing and skin antisepsis.Intensive Care Med. 2016 Nov;42(11):1784-1786. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4244-4. Epub 2016 Feb 3. Intensive Care Med. 2016. PMID: 26846517 Clinical Trial. No abstract available.
-
Can central venous access device care bundles and regular feedback reduce central line-associated complications in pediatric patients?Clin Exp Pediatr. 2021 Mar;64(3):123-129. doi: 10.3345/cep.2020.00143. Epub 2020 Jul 14. Clin Exp Pediatr. 2021. PMID: 32683808 Free PMC article.
-
Dressings and securement devices for central venous catheters (CVC).Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Sep 10;2015(9):CD010367. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010367.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015. PMID: 26358142 Free PMC article.
-
Prevention of device-related infections in patients with cancer: Current practice and future horizons.CA Cancer J Clin. 2023 Mar;73(2):147-163. doi: 10.3322/caac.21756. Epub 2022 Sep 23. CA Cancer J Clin. 2023. PMID: 36149820 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Catheter-associated bloodstream infection rates: how low can you go?Intensive Care Med. 2019 Jun;45(6):896-897. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05643-9. Epub 2019 May 14. Intensive Care Med. 2019. PMID: 31089762 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical