Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Sep 19:11:129.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-11-129.

Imputation of missing values of tumour stage in population-based cancer registration

Affiliations

Imputation of missing values of tumour stage in population-based cancer registration

Nora Eisemann et al. BMC Med Res Methodol. .

Abstract

Background: Missing data on tumour stage information is a common problem in population-based cancer registries. Statistical analyses on the level of tumour stage may be biased, if no adequate method for handling of missing data is applied. In order to determine a useful way to treat missing data on tumour stage, we examined different imputation models for multiple imputation with chained equations for analysing the stage-specific numbers of cases of malignant melanoma and female breast cancer.

Methods: This analysis was based on the malignant melanoma data set and the female breast cancer data set of the cancer registry Schleswig-Holstein, Germany. The cases with complete tumour stage information were extracted and their stage information partly removed according to a MAR missingness-pattern, resulting in five simulated data sets for each cancer entity. The missing tumour stage values were then treated with multiple imputation with chained equations, using polytomous regression, predictive mean matching, random forests and proportional sampling as imputation models. The estimated tumour stages, stage-specific numbers of cases and survival curves after multiple imputation were compared to the observed ones.

Results: The amount of missing values for malignant melanoma was too high to estimate a reasonable number of cases for each UICC stage. However, multiple imputation of missing stage values led to stage-specific numbers of cases of T-stage for malignant melanoma as well as T- and UICC-stage for breast cancer close to the observed numbers of cases. The observed tumour stages on the individual level, the stage-specific numbers of cases and the observed survival curves were best met with polytomous regression or predictive mean matching but not with random forest or proportional sampling as imputation models.

Conclusions: This limited simulation study indicates that multiple imputation with chained equations is an appropriate technique for dealing with missing information on tumour stage in population-based cancer registries, if the amount of unstaged cases is on a reasonable level.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
T-stage-specific survival curves for female breast cancer. The predicted survival curves are based on the 50 completed data sets.
Figure 2
Figure 2
T-stage-specific survival curves for malignant melanoma. The predicted survival curves are based on the 50 completed data sets.
Figure 3
Figure 3
UICC-stage-specific survival curves for female breast cancer. The predicted survival curves are based on the 50 completed data sets.
Figure 4
Figure 4
UICC-stage-specific survival curves for malignant melanoma. The predicted survival curves are based on the 50 completed data sets.

References

    1. Duffy SW, Tabar L, Vitak B, Day NE, Smith RA, Chen HHT, Yen MFA. The relative contributions of screen-detected in situ and invasive breast carcinomas in reducing mortality from the disease. European Journal of Cancer. 2003;39:1755–1760. doi: 10.1016/S0959-8049(03)00259-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fracheboud J, Otto SJ, van Dijck JAAM, Broeders MJM, Verbeek ALM, de Koning HJ. Decreased rates of advanced breast cancer due to mammography screening in The Netherlands. British Journal of Cancer. 2004;91:861–867. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Esserman L, Shieh Y, Thompson I. Rethinking screening for breast cancer and prostate cancer. JAMA. 2009;302:1685–1692. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1498. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wittekind C, Meyer HJ, Bootz F. TNM Klassifikation maligner Tumoren. 6. Berlin. Heidelberg. New York: Springer; 2002. Auflage edn.
    1. Urbschat I, Kieschke J, Rohde M, Langer C, Hecht W. Krebs in Niedersachsen 2006/07. Oldenburg; 2010.