Modeling fetal weight for gestational age: a comparison of a flexible multi-level spline-based model with other approaches
- PMID: 21931571
- PMCID: PMC3173606
- DOI: 10.2202/1557-4679.1305
Modeling fetal weight for gestational age: a comparison of a flexible multi-level spline-based model with other approaches
Abstract
We present a model for longitudinal measures of fetal weight as a function of gestational age. We use a linear mixed model, with a Box-Cox transformation of fetal weight values, and restricted cubic splines, in order to flexibly but parsimoniously model median fetal weight. We systematically compare our model to other proposed approaches. All proposed methods are shown to yield similar median estimates, as evidenced by overlapping pointwise confidence bands, except after 40 completed weeks, where our method seems to produce estimates more consistent with observed data. Sex-based stratification affects the estimates of the random effects variance-covariance structure, without significantly changing sex-specific fitted median values. We illustrate the benefits of including sex-gestational age interaction terms in the model over stratification. The comparison leads to the conclusion that the selection of a model for fetal weight for gestational age can be based on the specific goals and configuration of a given study without affecting the precision or value of median estimates for most gestational ages of interest.
Keywords: fetal growth; multi-level models; small for gestational age.
Figures







Similar articles
-
Single and Serial Fetal Biometry to Detect Preterm and Term Small- and Large-for-Gestational-Age Neonates: A Longitudinal Cohort Study.PLoS One. 2016 Nov 1;11(11):e0164161. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164161. eCollection 2016. PLoS One. 2016. PMID: 27802270 Free PMC article.
-
Comparing the Hadlock fetal growth standard to the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development racial/ethnic standard for the prediction of neonatal morbidity and small for gestational age.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Nov;219(5):474.e1-474.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.08.011. Epub 2018 Aug 14. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018. PMID: 30118689
-
Fetal Medicine Foundation fetal and neonatal population weight charts.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jul;52(1):44-51. doi: 10.1002/uog.19073. Epub 2018 May 30. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018. PMID: 29696704
-
Fetal growth velocity and body proportion in the assessment of growth.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Feb;218(2S):S700-S711.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.12.014. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018. PMID: 29422209 Review.
-
An analysis of birth weight by gestational age using a computerized perinatal data base, 1975-1992.Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Mar;83(3):342-52. Obstet Gynecol. 1994. PMID: 8127523 Review.
Cited by
-
A contemporary amniotic fluid volume chart for the United States: The NICHD Fetal Growth Studies-Singletons.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jul;221(1):67.e1-67.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.02.030. Epub 2019 Feb 18. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019. PMID: 30790566 Free PMC article.
-
Predicting large fetuses at birth: do multiple ultrasound examinations and longitudinal statistical modelling improve prediction?Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2012 May;26(3):199-207. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2012.01261.x. Epub 2012 Feb 10. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2012. PMID: 22471679 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Duan N. “Smearing estimate: a nonparametric retransformation method,”. J Amer Statist Assoc. 1983;78:605–610. doi: 10.2307/2288126. - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources