Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011;7(1):32.
doi: 10.2202/1557-4679.1305. Epub 2011 Aug 23.

Modeling fetal weight for gestational age: a comparison of a flexible multi-level spline-based model with other approaches

Affiliations

Modeling fetal weight for gestational age: a comparison of a flexible multi-level spline-based model with other approaches

Luc Villandré et al. Int J Biostat. 2011.

Abstract

We present a model for longitudinal measures of fetal weight as a function of gestational age. We use a linear mixed model, with a Box-Cox transformation of fetal weight values, and restricted cubic splines, in order to flexibly but parsimoniously model median fetal weight. We systematically compare our model to other proposed approaches. All proposed methods are shown to yield similar median estimates, as evidenced by overlapping pointwise confidence bands, except after 40 completed weeks, where our method seems to produce estimates more consistent with observed data. Sex-based stratification affects the estimates of the random effects variance-covariance structure, without significantly changing sex-specific fitted median values. We illustrate the benefits of including sex-gestational age interaction terms in the model over stratification. The comparison leads to the conclusion that the selection of a model for fetal weight for gestational age can be based on the specific goals and configuration of a given study without affecting the precision or value of median estimates for most gestational ages of interest.

Keywords: fetal growth; multi-level models; small for gestational age.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 6:
Figure 6:
Simulated individual weight-for-gestational-age trajectories. The curves have been simulated based on a model stratified on the sex variable.
Figure 7:
Figure 7:
Simulated individual weight-for-gestational-age trajectories. The curves have been simulated based on a model with sex-gestational age interaction.
Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Pregnancies from the Scandinavian dataset: Circles represent weight/gestational age pairs at birth and triangles represent estimated weight/gestational age pairs in utero.
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
Individual weight-for-gestational-age paths for males sampled from the Scandinavian dataset. Circles represent weight/gestational age pairs at birth and triangles represent estimated weight/gestational age pairs in utero.
Figure 3:
Figure 3:
Individual weight-for-gestational-age paths for females sampled from the Scandinavian dataset. Circles represent weight/gestational age pairs at birth and triangles represent estimated weight/gestational age pairs in utero.
Figure 4:
Figure 4:
Weight-for-gestational-age medians. The shaded region represents the proposed model’s 95 % pointwise confidence band.
Figure 5:
Figure 5:
Weight-for-gestational-age median trajectories. The shaded region represents the proposed model’s 95% pointwise confidence band.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Alexander GR, Himes JH, Kaufman RB, Mor J, Kogan M. “A United States national reference for fetal growth”. Obstet Gynecol. 1996;87:163–168. doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(95)00386-X. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bakketeig LS, Jacobsen G, Hoffman HJ, Lindmark G, Bergsjœ P, Molne K, Rœdsten J. “Pre-pregnancy risk factors of small-for-gestational age births among parous women in scandinavia”. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1993;72:273–279. doi: 10.3109/00016349309068037. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bertino E, Battista ED, Bossi A, Pagliano M, Fabris C, Aicardi G, Milani S. “Fetal growth velocity: kinetic, clinical, and biological aspects”. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1996;74:F10–F15. doi: 10.1136/fn.74.1.F10. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cole TJ, Green PJ. “Smoothing reference centile curves: the lms method and penalized likelihood”. Stat Med. 1992;11:1305–1319. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780111005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Duan N. “Smearing estimate: a nonparametric retransformation method,”. J Amer Statist Assoc. 1983;78:605–610. doi: 10.2307/2288126. - DOI

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources