Acute pyelonephritis in pregnancy: a prospective study of oral versus intravenous antibiotic therapy
- PMID: 2193265
Acute pyelonephritis in pregnancy: a prospective study of oral versus intravenous antibiotic therapy
Abstract
Ninety pregnant women admitted to the high-risk pregnancy unit with a diagnosis of acute pyelonephritis were randomized to receive either oral (cephalexin 500 mg every 6 hours) or intravenous (IV) (cephalothin 1 g every 6 hours) antibiotic therapy. All patients were initially hydrated with 1 L of normal saline IV over 4 hours. Neither parenteral analgesics nor antiemetics were used. Bacteremia was noted in 13 (14.4%) of the 90 patients and mandated IV therapy. There was no difference between the oral and IV groups concerning predefined criteria for successful therapy (91.4 versus 92.9% successful therapy, respectively). No characteristic available at presentation predicted bacteremia or ultimate failure of therapy. Two patients (2.2%) experienced significant complications. These data suggest that in nonbacteremic patients, oral antibiotics are both safe and effective for the treatment of acute pyelonephritis in pregnancy.
Comment in
-
Acute pyelonephritis in pregnancy: a prospective study of oral versus intravenous antibiotic therapy.Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Nov;76(5 Pt 1):891-2. Obstet Gynecol. 1990. PMID: 2216244 Clinical Trial. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical