Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Sep;89(3):503-23.
doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2011.00637.x.

Defining health diplomacy: changing demands in the era of globalization

Affiliations

Defining health diplomacy: changing demands in the era of globalization

Rebecca Katz et al. Milbank Q. 2011 Sep.

Abstract

Context: Accelerated globalization has produced obvious changes in diplomatic purposes and practices. Health issues have become increasingly preeminent in the evolving global diplomacy agenda. More leaders in academia and policy are thinking about how to structure and utilize diplomacy in pursuit of global health goals.

Methods: In this article, we describe the context, practice, and components of global health diplomacy, as applied operationally. We examine the foundations of various approaches to global health diplomacy, along with their implications for the policies shaping the international public health and foreign policy environments. Based on these observations, we propose a taxonomy for the subdiscipline.

Findings: Expanding demands on global health diplomacy require a delicate combination of technical expertise, legal knowledge, and diplomatic skills that have not been systematically cultivated among either foreign service or global health professionals. Nonetheless, high expectations that global health initiatives will achieve development and diplomatic goals beyond the immediate technical objectives may be thwarted by this gap.

Conclusions: The deepening links between health and foreign policy require both the diplomatic and global health communities to reexamine the skills, comprehension, and resources necessary to achieve their mutual objectives.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Total US Government Global Health Spending and CDC Personnel Deployed Overseas, 2004–2009. Note: a Data are not available for staffing levels. Values represent an average of the previous and following year. Sources: CDC 2004, 2006, 2008; Kates et al. 2010.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abbott F. The WTO Medicines Decision: World Pharmaceutical Trade and the Protection of Public Health. American Journal of International Law. 2005;99(317):317–58.
    1. Adams G, Bacchus WI, Chaplin S, Glaudemans D, Lief E, Nygard R, Saulino JJ, Silverman S, Siu Y. A Foreign Affairs Budget for the Future: Fixing the Crisis in Diplomatic Readiness. Washington, DC: American Academy of Diplomacy and Stimson Center; 2008.
    1. Adams V, Novotny T, Leslie H. Global Health Diplomacy. Medical Anthropology. 2008;27(4):315–23. - PubMed
    1. Aginam O. Global Health Governance, Intellectual Property and Access to Essential Medicines: Opportunities and Impediments for South-South Cooperation. Global Health Governance. 2010;4(1)
    1. Amorim C, Douste-Blazy P, Wirayuda H, Støre JG, Gadio CT, Dlamini-Zuma N, Pibulsonggram N. Oslo Ministerial Declaration—Global Health: A Pressing Foreign Policy Issue of Our Time. The Lancet. 2007;369(9570):1373–78. - PubMed