Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Nov;60(11):2883-91.
doi: 10.2337/db11-0340. Epub 2011 Sep 20.

FoxO feedback control of basal IRS-2 expression in pancreatic β-cells is distinct from that in hepatocytes

Affiliations

FoxO feedback control of basal IRS-2 expression in pancreatic β-cells is distinct from that in hepatocytes

Shin Tsunekawa et al. Diabetes. 2011 Nov.

Abstract

Objective: Appropriate regulation of insulin receptor substrate 2 (IRS-2) expression in pancreatic β-cells is essential to adequately compensate for insulin resistance. In liver, basal IRS-2 expression is controlled via a temporal negative feedback of sterol regulatory element-binding protein 1 (SREBP-1) to antagonize transcription factors forkhead box class O (FoxO)1/FoxO3a at an insulin response element (IRE) on the IRS-2 promoter. The purpose of the study was to examine if a similar mechanism controlled IRS-2 expression in β-cells.

Research design and methods: IRS-2 mRNA and protein expression, as well as IRS-2 gene promoter activity, were examined in isolated rat islets. Specific transcription factor association with the IRE on the IRS-2 promoter was examined by chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay, and their nuclear translocation was examined by immunofluorescence. A direct in vivo effect of insulin on control of IRS-2 expression in liver and pancreatic islets was also investigated.

Results: In IRS-2 promoter-reporter assays conducted in isolated islets, removal of the IRE decreased basal IRS-2 promoter activity in β-cells up to 80%. Activation of IRS signaling in isolated rat islets by insulin/IGF-I (used as an experimental in vitro tool) or downstream constitutive activation of protein kinase B (PKB) significantly decreased IRS-2 expression. In contrast, inhibition of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) or PKB significantly increased IRS-2 levels in β-cells. ChIP assays indicated that transcription factors FoxO1 and FoxO3a associated with the IRE on the IRS-2 promoter in β-cells in a PI3K/PKB-dependent manner, whereas others, such as SREBP-1, the transcription factor binding to immunoglobulin heavy chain enhancer 3', and the aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator (ARNT), did not. However, only FoxO3a, not FoxO1, was capable of driving IRS-2 promoter activity via the IRE in β-cells. In vivo studies showed insulin was able to suppress IRS-2 expression via activation of SREBP-1 in the liver, but this mechanism was not apparent in pancreatic islets from the same animal.

Conclusions: The molecular mechanism for feedback control of IRS signaling to decrease IRS-2 expression in liver and β-cells is quite distinct, with a predominant role played by FoxO3a in β-cells.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
Regulation of IRS-2 expression by IRS signaling in pancreatic islet β-cells. Isolated rat islets or INS-1 cells were incubated overnight at normal 5.6 mmol/L glucose and then incubated as indicated. Protein and mRNA expression of IRS-2 and PI3K p85 (control) were examined by immunoblot (IB) and qRT-PCR analyses, respectively, as outlined in research design and methods. A: Isolated rat islets or INS-1 cells, as indicated, were incubated at basal 3 mmol/L glucose for 6 h in the presence or absence of insulin (100 nmol/L) plus IGF-I (10 nmol/L) or the PI3K inhibitor LY294002 (50 μmol/L). An example IB is shown for protein analysis and the qRT-PCR mRNA analysis results are mean ± SEM (n ≥4). B: Isolated rat islets were incubated at basal 3 mmol/L or stimulatory 15 mmol/L glucose concentrations for 6 h in the presence or absence of LY294002 (50 μmol/L). Results of the qRT-PCR analysis are mean ± SEM (n ≥ 4) with an example IB shown. C: Isolated rat islets either uninfected or infected with adenoviruses expressing FLuc, WT, CA, or kinase-dead (KD) PKB-1 as indicated, then incubated for 6 h at either basal 3 mmol/L or stimulatory 15 mmol/L glucose. An example IB of three independent experiments is shown. The * indicates statistically significant difference (P ≤ 0.05).
FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.
The contribution of the IRS-2 promoter IRE to basal IRS-2 gene transcription. Isolated islets or INS-1 cells, as indicated, were infected with adenoviral vectors of either WT-IRS-2 promoter reporter (AdV-WT-IRS-2-FLuc) or IRE-mutated IRS-2 promoter reporter (AdV-Mut-IRS-2-FLuc) as indicated, together with the control TK promoter reporter (AdV-TK-RLuc). IRS-2 promoter activity was assessed as described in research design and methods. Results of relative luciferase activities are mean ± SEM (n ≥ 4). A: IRS-2 promoter activity in isolated islet preparations from different species and INS-1 cells incubated for 6 h at basal 3 mmol/L glucose. B: IRS-2 promoter activity in isolated rat islets incubated at basal 3 mmol/L glucose plus or minus insulin (100 nmol/L)/IGF-I (10 nmol/L) or the PI3K inhibitor LY294002 (50 μmol/L). The * indicates statistically significant difference (P ≤ 0.05).
FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.
IRS-2 signaling regulates FoxO1 and FoxO3a binding to the IRS-2 promoter IRE in β-cells. Isolated rat islets and INS-1 cells were examined for FoxO transcription factor expression association to the IRS-2 promoter’s IRE and nuclear translocation. A: Schematic representation of candidate transcription factors predicted to associate to the 546 to 593 region of the IRS-2 promoter around the IRE, E-box, and SREBP response element (SRE). B: Relative mRNA expression of the candidate transcription factors in isolated rat islets was assessed by qRT-PCR. A mean ± SEM (n ≥ 4) is shown. C and D: INS-1 cells were incubated at basal 3 mmol/L glucose for 6 h plus or minus insulin (100 nmol/L)/IGF-I (10 nmol/L) or PI3K inhibitor LY294002 (50 μmol/L) as indicated. ChIP assays for binding FoxO1, FoxO3a, SREBP-1, TFE3, or ARNT to the IRS-2 promoter IRE region were conducted (using rabbit IgG as a negative control) as described in research design and methods and analyzed by electrophoresis (C) or qRT-PCR (D). A mean ± SEM (n ≥ 3) is shown (D). The * indicates statistically significant difference (P ≤ 0.05). E: INS-1 cells were incubated at 3 mmol/L glucose for 6 h plus or minus insulin/IGF-I or LY294002 (50 μmol/L) and analyzed by immunofluorescence for FoxO1, FoxO3a, insulin, and DAPI to determine nuclear localization. Example images from three independent experiments are shown. (A high-quality digital representation of this figure is available in the online issue.)
FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.
FoxO3a predominately drives basal IRS-2 expression in β-cells. Adenovirally infected isolated rat islets were incubated as indicated, where “+” represents an equivalent dose of each adenoviral vector. The rat islet mRNA (A and C) and protein (B and D) levels of IRS-2 and PI3K p85 (control) were examined by qRT-PCR and immunoblot (IB) analyses, respectively, as described in research design and methods. The qRT-PCR data are shown as mean ± SEM (n ≥ 4), and an example immunoblot for protein analysis is shown. A and B: Isolated rat islets were infected with adenoviruses expressing GFP (control), FoxO1-WT, FoxO3a-WT, or in combination as indicated at basal 3 mmol/L glucose for 6 h. C and D: Isolated rat islets were infected with adenoviruses expressing GFP, FoxO1-CA, FoxO3a-CA, or in combination as indicated at basal 3 mmol/L glucose for 6 h plus or minus insulin (100 nmol/L)/IGF-I (10 nmol/L). The * indicates statistically significant difference (P ≤ 0.05).
FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.
FoxO3a predominately drives basal IRS-2 promoter activity β-cells. Relative FLuc activities mediated by either WT (AdV-WT-IRS-2-Luc) or IRE mutated (AdV-Mut-IRS-2-Luc) were measured as outlined in research design and methods in adenovirally infected isolated rat islets expressing GFP (AdV-GFP; control), WT FoxO1 (AdV-FoxO1-WT), or WT FoxO3a (AdV-FoxO3a-WT). Results are mean ± SEM (n ≥ 3). The * indicates statistically significant difference (P ≤ 0.05).
FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.
Distinct mechanisms regulate IRS-2 expression in vivo in liver and in islets. Normal rats were either fasted for 12 h (S) or allowed ad libitum feeding and subjected to an intraperitoneal injection of insulin (0.75 mU/g body wt) 2 h prior to tissue harvesting (F). The liver and pancreatic islets from the same rats were then harvested and analyzed in parallel. The protein expression levels of IRS-2, SREBP-1 (precursor and proteolyzed activated forms), FoxO1, FoxO3a, TFE3, ARNT, and PI3K p85 (control) were measured in parallel by immunoblotting. An example immunoblot (IB) analysis of a single animal is shown from three independent experiments.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rhodes CJ. Type 2 diabetes-a matter of β-cell life and death? Science 2005;307:380–384 - PubMed
    1. Withers DJ, Gutierrez JS, Towery H, et al. . Disruption of IRS-2 causes type 2 diabetes in mice. Nature 1998;391:900–904 - PubMed
    1. Withers DJ, Burks DJ, Towery HH, Altamuro SL, Flint CL, White MF. Irs-2 coordinates Igf-1 receptor-mediated beta-cell development and peripheral insulin signalling. Nat Genet 1999;23:32–40 - PubMed
    1. Kubota N, Tobe K, Terauchi Y, et al. . Disruption of insulin receptor substrate 2 causes type 2 diabetes because of liver insulin resistance and lack of compensatory beta-cell hyperplasia. Diabetes 2000;49:1880–1889 - PubMed
    1. Lingohr MK, Dickson LM, Wrede CE, et al. . Decreasing IRS-2 expression in pancreatic beta-cells (INS-1) promotes apoptosis, which can be compensated for by introduction of IRS-4 expression. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2003;209:17–31 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms