A cost-effectiveness analysis of different therapies in patients with chronic hepatitis B in Italy
- PMID: 21935331
- PMCID: PMC3169981
- DOI: 10.2147/CEOR.S16655
A cost-effectiveness analysis of different therapies in patients with chronic hepatitis B in Italy
Abstract
Introduction: Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is a prevalent disease associated with high morbidity, mortality, and impact on health care costs. Antiviral therapy is aimed at reducing hepatitis B virus replication in order to limit progressive liver disease and improve the natural history of the disease. This study estimates the cost-effectiveness of lamivudine, adefovir, telbivudine, entecavir, tenofovir, and pegylated interferon in patients with CHB.
Methods: A Markov model was developed to evaluate the costs and benefits of antivirals in a cohort of patients with CHB (hepatitis B e antigen [HBeAg]-positive and HBeAg-negative) and cirrhosis over a period of 10 years. Different rescue therapies were considered, according to current guidelines. Data on efficacy and changes in quality of life were derived from clinical trials and epidemiological Italian data. Direct costs were assessed from the perspective of the Italian National Health Service.
Results: Tenofovir was associated with lower costs and higher efficacy compared with entecavir, telbivudine, and adefovir, as shown by their incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained: tenofovir €30,959, entecavir €45,971, telbivudine €62,051, and adefovir €82,824. Even following 1 year of pegylated interferon therapy, tenofovir had a more favourable ICER per QALY gained compared with the other rescue options. The analysis of patients with cirrhosis confirms the results obtained with the CHB cohort though with higher ICERs. Sensitivity analyses on the main variables confirm the results of the base case scenario.
Conclusion: Within the Italian health care system, in patients with CHB, tenofovir is a cost-effective strategy compared with other available therapies. Public health care authorities would benefit from mathematical models designed to estimate the future burden of CHB infection together with the impact of treatment and drug resistance.
Keywords: Markov model; adefovir; chronic hepatitis B; cost-effectiveness; entecavir; lamivudine; pegylated interferon; telbivudine; tenofovir.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Modeling the cost-effectiveness of different oral antiviral therapies in patients with chronic hepatitis B.J Hepatol. 2009 Oct;51(4):640-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2009.04.013. Epub 2009 May 20. J Hepatol. 2009. PMID: 19576651
-
Entecavir for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B infection.Health Technol Assess. 2009 Oct;13 Suppl 3:31-6. doi: 10.3310/hta13suppl3/05. Health Technol Assess. 2009. PMID: 19846026 Review.
-
Cost effectiveness of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B from a Canadian public payer perspective.Pharmacoeconomics. 2011 Dec;29(12):1075-91. doi: 10.2165/11589260-000000000-00000. Pharmacoeconomics. 2011. PMID: 22077579
-
Economic Analysis and Budget Impact of Tenofovir and Entecavir in the First-Line Treatment of Hepatitis B Virus in Italy.Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2017 Aug;15(4):479-490. doi: 10.1007/s40258-017-0311-4. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2017. PMID: 28197805
-
Telbivudine for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B infection.Health Technol Assess. 2009 Oct;13 Suppl 3:23-30. doi: 10.3310/hta13suppl3/04. Health Technol Assess. 2009. PMID: 19846025 Review.
Cited by
-
Economic analysis of the first 20 years of universal hepatitis B vaccination program in Italy: an a posteriori evaluation and forecast of future benefits.Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2013 May;9(5):1119-28. doi: 10.4161/hv.23827. Epub 2013 Feb 1. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2013. PMID: 23376840 Free PMC article.
-
Cost-effectiveness analysis of initial HIV treatment under Italian guidelines.Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2011;3:197-205. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S24130. Epub 2011 Oct 31. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2011. PMID: 22163167 Free PMC article.
-
Cost-Effectiveness of Tenofovir Alafenamide for Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B in Canada.Pharmacoeconomics. 2020 Feb;38(2):181-192. doi: 10.1007/s40273-019-00852-y. Pharmacoeconomics. 2020. PMID: 31691902
-
Cost effectiveness of first-line oral antiviral therapies for chronic hepatitis B : a systematic review.Pharmacoeconomics. 2013 Jan;31(1):63-75. doi: 10.1007/s40273-012-0009-2. Pharmacoeconomics. 2013. PMID: 23329593
-
Cost-Effectiveness of Peg-Interferon, Interferon and Oral Nucleoside Analogues in the Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B and D Infections in China.Clin Drug Investig. 2016 Aug;36(8):637-48. doi: 10.1007/s40261-016-0409-8. Clin Drug Investig. 2016. PMID: 27166628
References
-
- European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL clinical practice guidelines: management of chronic hepatitis B. J Hepatol. 2009;50(2):227–242. - PubMed
-
- Dienstag JL. Hepatitis B virus infection. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(14):1486–1500. - PubMed
-
- Carey I, Harrison PM. Monotherapy versus combination therapy for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2009;18(11):1655–1666. - PubMed
-
- Chang TT, Gish RG, de Man R, et al. BEHoLD AI463022 Study Group A comparison of entecavir and lamivudine for HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(10):1001–1010. - PubMed
-
- Marcellin P, Heathcote EJ, Buti M, et al. Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate versus adefovir dipivoxil for chronic hepatitis B. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(23):2442–2455. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources