Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2012 Jan;33(1):85-91.
doi: 10.1007/s10840-011-9605-x. Epub 2011 Sep 21.

Atrial function after left atrial epicardial cryoablation for atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing mitral valve surgery

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Atrial function after left atrial epicardial cryoablation for atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing mitral valve surgery

Birgitta Johansson et al. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2012 Jan.

Abstract

Purpose: To explore the effects on atrial and ventricular function of restoring sinus rhythm (SR) after epicardial cryoablation and closure of the left atrial appendage (LAA) in patients with mitral valve disease and atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing surgery.

Methods: Sixty-five patients with permanent AF were randomized to mitral valve surgery combined with left atrial epicardial cryoablation and LAA closure (ABL group, n = 30) or to mitral valve surgery alone (control group, n = 35). Two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography were performed before and 6 months after surgery.

Results: At 6 months, 73% of the patients in the ABL group and 46% of the controls were in SR. Patients in SR at 6 months had a reduction in their left ventricular diastolic diameter while the left ventricular ejection fraction was unchanged. In patients remaining in AF, the left ventricular ejection fraction was lower than at baseline. The left atrial diastolic volume was reduced after surgery, more in patients with SR than AF. In patients in SR, the peak velocity during the atrial contraction and the reservoir function were lower in the ABL group than in the control group.

Conclusions: In patients in SR, signs of atrial dysfunction were observed in the ABL but not the control group. Atrial dysfunction may have existed before surgery, but the difference between the groups implies that the cryoablation procedure and/or closure of the LAA might have contributed.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Eur Heart J. 2007 Dec;28(23):2902-8 - PubMed
    1. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999 Apr;5(2):116-20 - PubMed
    1. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1994 Feb;107(2):408-15 - PubMed
    1. Circulation. 2001 Nov 20;104(21):2539-44 - PubMed
    1. Cleve Clin J Med. 1991 Sep-Oct;58(5):397-9 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources