Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jan;33(1):59-67.
doi: 10.1007/s10840-011-9615-8. Epub 2011 Sep 21.

Safety of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with permanent pacemakers: a collaborative clinical approach

Affiliations

Safety of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with permanent pacemakers: a collaborative clinical approach

Barry Anthony Boilson et al. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2012 Jan.

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to characterize the interactions of pacemakers with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and to identify device characteristics that could predict adverse interactions.

Background: The safety of MRI in patients with indwelling pacemaker systems remains uncertain. Previous studies demonstrated safety in most patients, but unpredictable, potentially concerning changes in pacemaker behavior have occurred.

Methods: We prospectively studied patients with pacemaker devices in situ who were not pacemaker dependent and in whom MRI was essential for adequate diagnosis and treatment. All patients were monitored by electrocardiography and pulse oximetry during scanning; devices were interrogated and cardiac enzymes were measured before and after scanning.

Results: Of 32 patients studied (46 MRI examinations), 28 patients had a dual-chamber system and one had a biventricular device. Regions scanned were the head and spine. Devices were reprogrammed to asynchronous pacing or sense-only mode in all except six patients before MRI. During six scanning episodes (five patients), "power-on" resetting of the device was noted. Magnet-mode pacing was noted during four episodes (three patients). Occasional premature ventricular contractions were noted in one patient. No significant changes in battery voltage, sensed P wave and R wave, pacing thresholds, lead impedance, or cardiac enzymes were noted immediately after MRI or at 1-month follow-up.

Conclusions: Overall, no significant changes were seen in pacemaker device function, and no adverse clinical events were observed. A minority of patients with older devices had unpredictable changes in device behavior, which stresses the need for close monitoring during and careful device interrogation after scanning.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2007;9(1):21-31 - PubMed
    1. Eur Heart J. 2005 Feb;26(4):376-83; discussion 325-7 - PubMed
    1. Circulation. 2006 Sep 19;114(12):1277-84 - PubMed
    1. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2007;9(1):5-13 - PubMed
    1. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2002 Oct;25(10):1419-23 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources