This site needs JavaScript to work properly. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features!

Skip to main page content

Add to Collections

Your saved search

Name of saved search:

Search terms:

Test search terms

Would you like email updates of new search results?

Yes
No

Email: (change)

Frequency:

Which day?

Which day?

Report format:

Send at most:

Send even when there aren't any new results

Optional text in email:

Your RSS Feed

. 2012 Jan;81(1):1-3.

doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2011.01789.x. Epub 2011 Nov 10.

CCMG statement on direct-to-consumer genetic testing

CCMG Ethics and Public Policy Committee; T N Nelson, L Armstrong, J Richer, J Evans, J Lauzon, B McGillivray, H Bruyere, S Dougan

PMID: 21943145
DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2011.01789.x

CCMG statement on direct-to-consumer genetic testing

CCMG Ethics and Public Policy Committee et al. Clin Genet. 2012 Jan.

. 2012 Jan;81(1):1-3.

doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2011.01789.x. Epub 2011 Nov 10.

Authors

CCMG Ethics and Public Policy Committee; T N Nelson, L Armstrong, J Richer, J Evans, J Lauzon, B McGillivray, H Bruyere, S Dougan

PMID: 21943145
DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2011.01789.x

No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Direct-to-consumer genomics and research ethics: should a more robust informed consent process be included?
Wasson K. Wasson K. Am J Bioeth. 2009;9(6-7):56-8. doi: 10.1080/15265160902893965. Am J Bioeth. 2009. PMID: 19998119 No abstract available.
Direct-to-consumer genetics and health policy: a worst-case scenario?
Caulfield T. Caulfield T. Am J Bioeth. 2009;9(6-7):48-50. doi: 10.1080/15265160902918770. Am J Bioeth. 2009. PMID: 19998115 No abstract available.
Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: access and marketing.
McCabe LL, McCabe ER. McCabe LL, et al. Genet Med. 2004 Jan-Feb;6(1):58-9. doi: 10.1097/01.gim.0000105753.01536.be. Genet Med. 2004. PMID: 14726811 No abstract available.
Stakeholder expectations for radiologists: obstacles or opportunities?
Boland GW. Boland GW. J Am Coll Radiol. 2006 Mar;3(3):156-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2005.10.008. J Am Coll Radiol. 2006. PMID: 17412031 Review. No abstract available.
Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: perceptions, problems, and policy responses.
Caulfield T, McGuire AL. Caulfield T, et al. Annu Rev Med. 2012;63:23-33. doi: 10.1146/annurev-med-062110-123753. Epub 2011 Sep 1. Annu Rev Med. 2012. PMID: 21888511 Review.

See all similar articles

Cited by

Third party interpretation of raw genetic data: an ethical exploration.
Badalato L, Kalokairinou L, Borry P. Badalato L, et al. Eur J Hum Genet. 2017 Nov;25(11):1189-1194. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2017.126. Epub 2017 Aug 23. Eur J Hum Genet. 2017. PMID: 28832567 Free PMC article. Review.
Health care providers and direct-to-consumer access and advertising of genetic testing in the United States.
Myers MF. Myers MF. Genome Med. 2011 Dec 28;3(12):81. doi: 10.1186/gm297. Genome Med. 2011. PMID: 22204616 Free PMC article.
Canadian genetic healthcare professionals' attitudes towards discussing private pay options with patients.
Di Gioacchino V, Langlois S, Elliott AM. Di Gioacchino V, et al. Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2019 Apr;7(4):e00572. doi: 10.1002/mgg3.572. Epub 2019 Feb 2. Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2019. PMID: 30712332 Free PMC article.
Considerations on the identification and management of metastatic prostate cancer patients with DNA repair gene alterations in the Canadian context.
Kolinsky MP, Niederhoffer KY, Kwan EM, Hotte SJ, Hamilou Z, Yip SM, Chi KN, Wyatt AW, Saad F. Kolinsky MP, et al. Can Urol Assoc J. 2022 Apr;16(4):132-143. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.7621. Can Urol Assoc J. 2022. PMID: 34812730 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.

MeSH terms

Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources
- Wiley
Medical
- MedlinePlus Health Information