Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Sep 23:11:67.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-11-67.

An appraisal of students' awareness of "self-reflection" in a first-year pathology course of undergraduate medical/dental education

Affiliations

An appraisal of students' awareness of "self-reflection" in a first-year pathology course of undergraduate medical/dental education

Rani Kanthan et al. BMC Med Educ. .

Abstract

Background: Self-reflection and reflective practice are increasingly considered as essential attributes of competent professionals functioning in complex and ever-changing healthcare systems of the 21st century. The aim of this study was to determine the extent of students' awareness and understanding of the reflective process and the meaning of 'self-reflection' within the contextual framework of their learning environment in the first-year of their medical/dental education. We endorse that the introduction of such explicit educational tasks at this early stage enhances and promotes students' awareness, understanding, and proficiency of this skill in their continuing life-long health professional learning.

Methods: Over two years, students registered in first-year pathology at the University of Saskatchewan were introduced to a self-reflection assignment which comprised in the submission of a one-page reflective document to a template of reflective questions provided in the given context of their learning environment. This was a mandatory but ungraded component at the midterm and final examinations. These documents were individually analyzed and thematically categorized to a "5 levels-of-reflection-awareness" scale using a specially-designed rubric based on the accepted major theories of reflection that included students' identification of: 1) personal abilities, 2) personal learning styles 3) relationships between course material and student history 4) emotional responses and 5) future applications.

Results: 410 self-reflection documents were analyzed. The student self-awareness on personal learning style (72.7% level 3+) and course content (55.2% level 3+) were well-reflected. Reflections at a level 1 awareness included identification of a) specific teaching strategies utilized to enhance learning (58.4%), b) personal strengths/weaknesses (53%), and c) emotional responses, values, and beliefs (71.5%). Students' abilities to connect information to life experiences and to future events with understanding were more evenly distributed across all 5 levels of reflection-awareness.

Conclusions: Exposure to self-reflection assignments in the early years of undergraduate medical education increases student awareness and promotes the creation of personal meaning of one's reactions, values, and premises in the context of student learning environments. Early introduction with repetition to such cognitive processes as practice tools increases engagement in reflection that may facilitate proficiency in mastering this competency leading to the creation of future reflective health professionals.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
This is a graphic representation of the qualitative analysis of the students' self-reflective documents. The y-axis shows the percentage of student responses in the various levels of reflection to the various categories as listed on the x-axis. Level 1 indicates a limited reflection-awareness while level 5 represents a well-reflected response. The categories on the x-axis are as follows: Category A: Significant events from course that led to reflection. Category B: Information/Skills acquired from course. Category C: Personal abilities. Category D: Personal learning style. Category E: Connections between the course and past life experiences. Category F: Oneself in relation to the situation (emotions, values, beliefs, etc.).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Riley-Doucet C. A three-step method of self-reflection using reflective journal writing. J Adv Nurs. 1997;25:964–8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.1997025964.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Boud D. Using journal writing to enhance reflective practice. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education. 2001;90:9–17.
    1. Wald HS, Reis SP. Beyond the margins: reflective writing and development of reflective capacity in medical education. J Gen Intern Med. 2010;25(7):746–9. doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1347-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cleary TJ. The use of reflection in medical education: guide supplement 44.1--viewpoint. Medical Teacher. 2011;33:500–1. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2010.540596. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sandars J. The use of reflection in medical education: AMEE guide No. 44. Medical Teacher. 2009;31:685–95. doi: 10.1080/01421590903050374. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources