Contralateral white noise attenuates 40-Hz auditory steady-state fields but not N100m in auditory evoked fields
- PMID: 21945467
- DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.08.108
Contralateral white noise attenuates 40-Hz auditory steady-state fields but not N100m in auditory evoked fields
Abstract
The different response characteristics of the different auditory cortical responses under conventional central masking conditions were examined by comparing the effects of contralateral white noise on the cortical component of 40-Hz auditory steady state fields (ASSFs) and the N100 m component in auditory evoked fields (AEFs) for tone bursts using a helmet-shaped magnetoencephalography system in 8 healthy volunteers (7 males, mean age 32.6 years). The ASSFs were elicited by monaural 1000 Hz amplitude modulation tones at 80 dB SPL, with the amplitude modulated at 39 Hz. The AEFs were elicited by monaural 1000 Hz tone bursts of 60 ms duration (rise and fall times of 10 ms, plateau time of 40 ms) at 80 dB SPL. The results indicated that continuous white noise at 70 dB SPL presented to the contralateral ear did not suppress the N100 m response in either hemisphere, but significantly reduced the amplitude of the 40-Hz ASSF in both hemispheres with asymmetry in that suppression of the 40-Hz ASSF was greater in the right hemisphere. Different effects of contralateral white noise on these two responses may reflect different functional auditory processes in the cortices.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Effects of continuous masking noise on tone-evoked magnetic fields in humans.Brain Res. 2006 May 4;1087(1):151-8. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.03.004. Epub 2006 Apr 13. Brain Res. 2006. PMID: 16626668
-
[Right hemispheric dominancy in the auditory evoked magnetic fields for pure-tone stimuli].No To Shinkei. 1996 Mar;48(3):240-4. No To Shinkei. 1996. PMID: 8868334 Clinical Trial. Japanese.
-
Effects of contralateral noise on 40-Hz and 80-Hz auditory steady-state responses.Ear Hear. 2009 Oct;30(5):584-9. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181acfb57. Ear Hear. 2009. PMID: 19550336
-
Magnetoencephalographic studies of auditory system function.J Clin Neurophysiol. 1994 May;11(3):343-64. doi: 10.1097/00004691-199405000-00005. J Clin Neurophysiol. 1994. PMID: 8089205 Review.
-
Auditory Mapping With MEG: An Update on the Current State of Clinical Research and Practice With Considerations for Clinical Practice Guidelines.J Clin Neurophysiol. 2020 Nov;37(6):574-584. doi: 10.1097/WNP.0000000000000518. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2020. PMID: 33165230 Review.
Cited by
-
Different contra-sound effects between noise and music stimuli seen in N1m and psychophysical responses.PLoS One. 2021 Dec 20;16(12):e0261637. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261637. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 34928999 Free PMC article.
-
Auditory brainstem mechanisms likely compensate for self-imposed peripheral inhibition.Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 4;13(1):12693. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-39850-8. Sci Rep. 2023. PMID: 37542191 Free PMC article.
-
No counterpart of visual perceptual echoes in the auditory system.PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e49287. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049287. Epub 2012 Nov 8. PLoS One. 2012. PMID: 23145143 Free PMC article.
-
The Effect of Simultaneous Contralateral White Noise Masking on Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials Elicited by Speech Stimuli.Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Feb 5;28(1):e115-e121. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1767675. eCollection 2024 Jan. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024. PMID: 38322432 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of Audio-Visual Asynchrony on Lip-Reading Effects -Neuromagnetic and Psychophysical Study.PLoS One. 2016 Dec 28;11(12):e0168740. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168740. eCollection 2016. PLoS One. 2016. PMID: 28030631 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous