Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2011 Sep;47(3):375-80.

Are ultrasound, laser and exercise superior to each other in the treatment of subacromial impingement syndrome? A randomized clinical trial

Affiliations
  • PMID: 21946399
Free article
Randomized Controlled Trial

Are ultrasound, laser and exercise superior to each other in the treatment of subacromial impingement syndrome? A randomized clinical trial

H T Calis et al. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2011 Sep.
Free article

Abstract

Background: Subacromial impingement syndrome (SIS) is the most common reason for shoulder pain. Ultrasound and laser are the physical therapy modalities, in conservative treatment of SIS.

Aim: The aim of this study was to define and compare the efficacy of ultrasound, laser and exercise in the treatment of SIS.

Design: This was a randomized controlled trial with-pre and post-treatment evaluations

Setting: Out-patients referred to physical medicine and rehabilitation unit.

Population: This study was performed on 52 patients with SIS. The patients were randomly allocated into three groups

Methods: The patients were treated five days a week for three weeks with hotpack+ultrasound+exercise (the first group); hotpack+laser+exercise (the second group), or hotpack+exercise (the third group). The pre and post treatment ranges of motion were measured in the patients. The visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to evaluate the severity of pain. Constant scoring was used to evaluate the shoulder functions and the results were compared after the treatment.

Results: When the post-treatment results of the groups were compared with the pretreatment results, there was a statistically significant improvement in each of the three groups, in the pain, the range of motion and the functional improvement at the shoulder (P<0.05). However, the inter-group comparison did not reveal any statistically significant difference in the parameters indicating improvement (P>0.05).

Conclusion: The results of this study demonstrated that ultrasound and laser treatments were not superior to each other in the treatment of SIS.

Clinical rehabilitation impact: . Exercise treatment forms the base for the conservative treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources