Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Nov;28(11):1129-33.
doi: 10.1007/s10815-011-9639-0. Epub 2011 Sep 23.

Reducing inter-observer variability in embryo evaluation by means of training courses

Affiliations

Reducing inter-observer variability in embryo evaluation by means of training courses

Rafael Ruiz de Assin et al. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2011 Nov.

Abstract

Purpose: To study the utility of a training session offered to junior embryologists, comparing the results obtained with those reported by a group of senior embryologists.

Methods: The 62 junior embryologists participanting were asked to decide on the quality of the embryos and theg clinical decision to be taken.

Results: The junior embryologists' success rate following the training course was significantly higher than before for embryo classification (48.4% ± 20.4 vs. 59.7% ±16.7) (p < 0.05) and for clinical decision (54.7% ± 19.6 vs. 68.7% ± 17.6) (p < 0.005). Comparison of the degree of agreement between the categories assigned by the junior embryologists and those assigned by consensus among the group of senior embryologists revealed kappa values of k = 0.32 before the course and of k = 0.54 after it. The comparison between pre- and post-training junior and senior embryologists also reflected an improvement in the kappa index for clinical decision, from k = 0.54 to k = 0.68.

Conclusions: Training courses are shown to be an effective tool for increasing the degree of agreement between junior and senior embryologists.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Percentage of embryos agreed upon by all of the junior embryologists in the training course. a Embryo classification; b Clinical decision

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sharpe-Timms KL, Zimmer RL. Oocyte and pre-embryo classification. In: Kal BA, May JV, Jonge CI, editors. Handbook of the assisted reproduction laboratory. 1. USA: CRC; 2000. pp. 179–196.
    1. Fisch JD, Rodriguez H, Ross R, Overby G, Sher G. The graduated embryo score (GES) predicts blastocyst formation and pregnancy rate from cleavage-stage embryos. Hum Reprod. 2001;16:1970–1975. doi: 10.1093/humrep/16.9.1970. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Placido G, Wilding M, Strina I, Alviggi E, Alviggi C, Mollo A, et al. High outcome predictability alter IVF using a combined store for zygote and embryo morphology and growth rate. Hum Reprod. 2002;17:2402–2409. doi: 10.1093/humrep/17.9.2402. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Holte J, Berglund L, Milton K, Garello C, Gennarelli G, Revelli A, et al. Construction of an evidence-based integrated morphology cleavage embryo score for implantation potential of embryos scored and transferred on day 2 after oocyte retrieval. Hum Reprod. 2007;22:548–557. doi: 10.1093/humrep/del403. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Keck C, Fischer R, Baukloh V, Alper M. Quality management in reproductive medicine. In: Gadner DK, Weissman A, Howles CM, Shohan Z, editors. Textbook of assisted reproductive techniques. Laboratory and clinical perspectives. 2. London and New York: Taylor and Francis; 2004. pp. 477–494.

LinkOut - more resources