Reducing inter-observer variability in embryo evaluation by means of training courses
- PMID: 21947757
- PMCID: PMC3224171
- DOI: 10.1007/s10815-011-9639-0
Reducing inter-observer variability in embryo evaluation by means of training courses
Abstract
Purpose: To study the utility of a training session offered to junior embryologists, comparing the results obtained with those reported by a group of senior embryologists.
Methods: The 62 junior embryologists participanting were asked to decide on the quality of the embryos and theg clinical decision to be taken.
Results: The junior embryologists' success rate following the training course was significantly higher than before for embryo classification (48.4% ± 20.4 vs. 59.7% ±16.7) (p < 0.05) and for clinical decision (54.7% ± 19.6 vs. 68.7% ± 17.6) (p < 0.005). Comparison of the degree of agreement between the categories assigned by the junior embryologists and those assigned by consensus among the group of senior embryologists revealed kappa values of k = 0.32 before the course and of k = 0.54 after it. The comparison between pre- and post-training junior and senior embryologists also reflected an improvement in the kappa index for clinical decision, from k = 0.54 to k = 0.68.
Conclusions: Training courses are shown to be an effective tool for increasing the degree of agreement between junior and senior embryologists.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Inter-observer and intra-observer agreement between embryologists during selection of a single Day 5 embryo for transfer: a multicenter study.Hum Reprod. 2017 Feb;32(2):307-314. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew330. Epub 2016 Dec 28. Hum Reprod. 2017. PMID: 28031323
-
Should we freeze it? Agreement on fate of borderline blastocysts is poor and does not improve with a modified blastocyst grading system.Hum Reprod. 2020 May 1;35(5):1045-1053. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaa060. Hum Reprod. 2020. PMID: 32358601
-
Interobserver agreement and intraobserver reproducibility of embryo quality assessments.Hum Reprod. 2006 Aug;21(8):2141-8. doi: 10.1093/humrep/del106. Epub 2006 Apr 10. Hum Reprod. 2006. PMID: 16606640 Clinical Trial.
-
Inter-centre reliability in embryo grading across several IVF clinics is limited: implications for embryo selection.Reprod Biomed Online. 2022 Jan;44(1):39-48. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2021.09.022. Epub 2021 Oct 6. Reprod Biomed Online. 2022. PMID: 34819249
-
Use of time-lapse monitoring in medically assisted reproduction treatments: a mini-review.Zygote. 2021 Apr;29(2):93-101. doi: 10.1017/S0967199420000623. Epub 2020 Nov 24. Zygote. 2021. PMID: 33228819 Review.
Cited by
-
Time-lapse imaging systems in IVF laboratories: a French national survey.J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018 Dec;35(12):2181-2186. doi: 10.1007/s10815-018-1302-6. Epub 2018 Sep 6. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018. PMID: 30187427 Free PMC article.
-
Beyond appearance: Can morphologically low-grade euploid blastocysts yield successful pregnancies?Reprod Med Biol. 2024 Jan 18;23(1):e12560. doi: 10.1002/rmb2.12560. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec. Reprod Med Biol. 2024. PMID: 38249352 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Sharpe-Timms KL, Zimmer RL. Oocyte and pre-embryo classification. In: Kal BA, May JV, Jonge CI, editors. Handbook of the assisted reproduction laboratory. 1. USA: CRC; 2000. pp. 179–196.
-
- Holte J, Berglund L, Milton K, Garello C, Gennarelli G, Revelli A, et al. Construction of an evidence-based integrated morphology cleavage embryo score for implantation potential of embryos scored and transferred on day 2 after oocyte retrieval. Hum Reprod. 2007;22:548–557. doi: 10.1093/humrep/del403. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Keck C, Fischer R, Baukloh V, Alper M. Quality management in reproductive medicine. In: Gadner DK, Weissman A, Howles CM, Shohan Z, editors. Textbook of assisted reproductive techniques. Laboratory and clinical perspectives. 2. London and New York: Taylor and Francis; 2004. pp. 477–494.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources