Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Sep 1;46(9):916-922.
doi: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2011.02.019.

A Framework for Comparative Evaluation of Dosimetric Methods to Triage a Large Population Following a Radiological Event

Affiliations

A Framework for Comparative Evaluation of Dosimetric Methods to Triage a Large Population Following a Radiological Event

Ann Barry Flood et al. Radiat Meas. .

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To prepare for a possible major radiation disaster involving large numbers of potentially exposed people, it is important to be able to rapidly and accurately triage people for treatment or not, factoring in the likely conditions and available resources. To date, planners have had to create guidelines for triage based on methods for estimating dose that are clinically available and which use evidence extrapolated from unrelated conditions. Current guidelines consequently focus on measuring clinical symptoms (e.g., time-to-vomiting), which may not be subject to the same verification of standard methods and validation processes required for governmental approval processes of new and modified procedures. Biodosimeters under development have not yet been formally approved for this use. Neither set of methods has been tested in settings involving large-scale populations at risk for exposure. OBJECTIVE: To propose a framework for comparative evaluation of methods for such triage and to evaluate biodosimetric methods that are currently recommended and new methods as they are developed. METHODS: We adapt the NIH model of scientific evaluations and sciences needed for effective translational research to apply to biodosimetry for triaging very large populations following a radiation event. We detail criteria for translating basic science about dosimetry into effective multi-stage triage of large populations and illustrate it by analyzing 3 current guidelines and 3 advanced methods for biodosimetry. CONCLUSIONS: This framework for evaluating dosimetry in large populations is a useful technique to compare the strengths and weaknesses of different dosimetry methods. It can help policy-makers and planners not only to compare the methods' strengths and weaknesses for their intended use but also to develop an integrated approach to maximize their effectiveness. It also reveals weaknesses in methods that would benefit from further research and evaluation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure
Figure
Figure A: Adapting the Translational Roadmap of the National Institutes of Health Figure B: A Comparative Framework of Biodosimetric Methods: Criteria to Assess Three Levels of Triaging Victims for Ultimate Treatment
Figure
Figure
Figure A: Adapting the Translational Roadmap of the National Institutes of Health Figure B: A Comparative Framework of Biodosimetric Methods: Criteria to Assess Three Levels of Triaging Victims for Ultimate Treatment

References

    1. AFRRI (Armed Forces Radiobiology Research Institute. [Accessed February 15, 2011];BAT and FRAT: Biodose Tools. 2011 http://www.afrri.usuhs.mil/outreach/biodostools.htm.
    1. Albert GC, McNamee JP, Marro L, Bellier PV, Prato FS, Thomas AW. Assessment of genetic damage in peripheral blood of human volunteers exposed (whole-body) to a 200 muT, 60 hz magnetic field. Int J Radiat Biol. 2009;85(2):144–152. - PubMed
    1. Alexander GA, Swartz HM, Amundson SA, Blakely WF, Buddemeier B, Gallez B, Dainiak N, Goans RE, Hayes RB, Lowry PC. BiodosEPR-2006 meeting: Acute dosimetry consensus committee recommendations on biodosimetry applications in events involving uses of radiation by terrorists and radiation accidents. Radiat. Measur. 2007;42(6–7):972–996.
    1. Avondoglio D, Scott T, Kil WJ, Sproull M, Tofilon PJ, Camphausen K. High throughput evaluation of γ-H2AX. Radiat. Oncol. 2009;24:4–31. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bell W, Dallas C. Vulnerability of populations and the urban health care systems to nuclear weapon attack: Examples from four American cities. Int J Health Geogr. 2007;6(1):5, 1–33. - PMC - PubMed