Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011;16 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):55-72.
doi: 10.1080/10810730.2011.604381.

Understanding the internal and external validity of health literacy interventions: a systematic literature review using the RE-AIM framework

Kacie Allen  1 , Jamie Zoellner, Monica Motley, Paul A Estabrooks
Affiliations

Understanding the internal and external validity of health literacy interventions: a systematic literature review using the RE-AIM framework

Kacie Allen et al. J Health Commun. 2011.

Abstract

We conducted a systematic literature review, using the RE-AIM framework, with the goal of determining what information is available to inform research to practice translation of health promotion interventions developed to address health literacy. Thirty-one articles reflecting 25 trials published between 2000 and 2010 met inclusion criteria. Two researchers coded each article, using a validated RE-AIM (reach, effectiveness/efficacy, adoption, implementation, maintenance) data extraction tool, and group meetings were used to gain consensus on discrepancies. Across all studies (14 randomized controlled trials, 11 quasi-experimental; 24 clinic-based, 1 community-based), the mean level of reporting RE-AIM indicators varied by dimension (reach = 69%; efficacy/ effectiveness = 58%; adoption = 36%; implementation = 35%; maintenance = 11%). Among participants enrolled in the 25 interventions, approximately 38% were identified as low health literate. Only eight of the studies examined health literacy status as a moderator of intervention effectiveness. This review suggests that the current research on health promotion for participants with low health literacy provides insufficient information to conclude whether interventions for health literacy can attract the target population, achieve an effect that is sustainable, or be generalized outside of clinical settings. Recommendations for enhancing the design and reporting of these trials are provided.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Selection of health literacy intervention studies for systematic review. (1Contact lead author for complete citations of 41 reviewed, but excluded articles.)
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Akers J, Estabrooks PA, Davy BM. Translational research: Bridging the gap between long-term weight loss maintenance research and practice. Journal of the American Dietetic Association. 2010;110(10):1511–1522. - PMC - PubMed
    1. American Medical Association-Medical Student Services Community Service Committee. Health Literacy. 2004 Retrieved from http://www.ama-assn.org.
    1. American Medical Association. Understanding health literacy: Implications for medicine and public health. AMA Press; 2005.
    1. Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1986;51(6):1173–1182. - PubMed
    1. Berkman ND, Sheridan SL, Donahue KE, Halpern DJ, Viera A, Crotty K, et al. Health literacy interventions and outcomes: An update of the literacy and health outcomes systematic review of the literature. Chapel Hill, NC: RTI International–University of North Carolina Evidence-based Practice Center; 2004. (Contract No. 2902007100561 #5)

Publication types