Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jan;8(1):130-3.
doi: 10.1111/j.1740-8709.2011.00340.x. Epub 2011 Sep 28.

Mid-upper arm circumference and weight-for-height to identify high-risk malnourished under-five children

Affiliations

Mid-upper arm circumference and weight-for-height to identify high-risk malnourished under-five children

André Briend et al. Matern Child Nutr. 2012 Jan.

Abstract

The World Health Organization and UNICEF define non-oedematous severe acute malnutrition (SAM) either by a mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) less than 115 mm or by a weight-for-height z-score (WHZ) less than -3. The objective of this study was to assess whether there was any benefit to identify malnourished children with a high risk of death to combine these two diagnostic criteria. Data of a longitudinal study examining the relationship between anthropometry and mortality in rural Senegal and predating the development of community-based management of SAM were used for this study. First, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of MUAC and of WHZ to predict mortality were drawn, and then the points corresponding to WHZ less than -3 and/or MUAC less than 115 mm were positioned in relation to these curves. MUAC had the highest ROC curve, which indicates that it identifies high-risk children better than WHZ. Both points representing WHZ less than -3 and/or MUAC less than 115 mm were below the MUAC ROC curve. It is concluded that to identify high-risk malnourished children, there is no benefit in using both WHZ less than -3 and/or MUAC less than 115 mm, and that using MUAC alone is preferable.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Receiver operating characteristic curves of MUAC and WHZ and combinations of WHZ ≤−3 and/or MUAC <115 mm. The two vertical dotted lines represent WHZ = −3 (left) and MUAC = 115 mm (right). MUAC, mid‐upper arm circumference; WHZ, weight‐for‐height z‐score.

References

    1. Bairagi R. (1981) On validity of some anthropometric indicators as predictors of mortality. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 34, 2592–2594. - PubMed
    1. Berkley J., Mwangi I., Griffiths K., Ahmed I., Mithwani S., English M. et al (2005) Assessment of severe malnutrition among hospitalized children in rural Kenya: comparison of weight for height and mid upper arm circumference. JAMA: the Journal of the American Medical Association 294, 591–597. - PubMed
    1. Brambilla P., Rolland‐Cachera M.F., Testolin C., Briend A., Salvatoni A., Testolin G. et al (2000) Lean mass of children in various nutritional states. Comparison between dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry and anthropometry. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 904, 433–436. - PubMed
    1. Briend A., Garenne M., Maire B., Fontaine O. & Dieng K. (1989) Nutritional status, age and survival: the muscle mass hypothesis. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 43, 715–726. - PubMed
    1. Cogill B. (2003) Anthropometric Indicators Measurement Guide. FANTA: Washington, DC. Available at: http://www.fantaproject.org/downloads/pdfs/anthro_1.pdf

Publication types