Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Dec;34(12):2597-602.
doi: 10.2337/dc11-0827. Epub 2011 Sep 27.

Evaluation of nonfasting tests to screen for childhood and adolescent dysglycemia

Affiliations

Evaluation of nonfasting tests to screen for childhood and adolescent dysglycemia

Joyce M Lee et al. Diabetes Care. 2011 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: To assess performance of nonfasting tests to screen children for dysglycemia (prediabetes or diabetes).

Research design and methods: This was a cross-sectional study of 254 overweight or obese (BMI ≥85th percentile) children aged 10-17 years. Subjects came for two visits to a clinical research unit. For visit one, they arrived fasting and a 2-h glucose tolerance test and HbA(1c) and fructosamine testing were performed. For visit two, they arrived nonfasting and had a random plasma glucose, a 1-h 50-g nonfasting glucose challenge test (1-h GCT), and urine dipstick performed. The primary end point was dysglycemia (fasting plasma glucose ≥100 mg/dL or a 2-h postglucose ≥140 mg/dL). Test performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and calculations of area under the ROC curve.

Results: Approximately one-half of children were female, 59% were white, and 30% were black. There were 99 (39%) cases of prediabetes and 3 (1.2%) cases of diabetes. Urine dipstick, HbA(1c) (area under the curve [AUC] 0.54 [95% CI 0.47-0.61]), and fructosamine (AUC 0.55 [0.47-0.63]) displayed poor discrimination for identifying children with dysglycemia. Both random glucose (AUC 0.66 [0.60-0.73]) and 1-h GCT (AUC 0.68 [0.61-0.74]) had better levels of test discrimination than HbA(1c) or fructosamine.

Conclusions: HbA(1c) had poor discrimination, which could lead to missed cases of dysglycemia in children. Random glucose or 1-h GCT may potentially be incorporated into clinical practice as initial screening tests for prediabetes or diabetes and for determining which children should undergo further definitive testing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
ROC curve for predicting dysglycemia (prediabetes or diabetes) at various thresholds of nonfasting tests. A: HbA1c (AUC 0.54 [95% CI 0.47–0.61]; n = 254). B: Fructosamine (AUC 0.55 [0.47–0.63]; n = 222). C: Random glucose (AUC 0.66 [0.60–0.73]; n = 243). D: 1-h GCT (AUC 0.68 [0.61–0.74]; n = 241).

References

    1. Pinhas-Hamiel O, Dolan LM, Daniels SR, Standiford D, Khoury PR, Zeitler P. Increased incidence of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus among adolescents. J Pediatr 1996;128:608–615 - PubMed
    1. Lipton RB, Drum M, Burnet D, et al. Obesity at the onset of diabetes in an ethnically diverse population of children: what does it mean for epidemiologists and clinicians? Pediatrics 2005;115:e553–e560 - PubMed
    1. American Diabetes Association Type 2 diabetes in children and adolescents. Pediatrics 2000;105:671–680 - PubMed
    1. Krebs NF, Himes JH, Jacobson D, Nicklas TA, Guilday P, Styne D. Assessment of child and adolescent overweight and obesity. Pediatrics 2007;120(Suppl. 4):S193–S228 - PubMed
    1. Kaufman FR. Type 2 diabetes in children and youth. Rev Endocr Metab Disord 2003;4:33–42 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms