Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Dec;7(4):259-65.
doi: 10.1007/s13181-011-0177-z.

The Toxicology Investigators Consortium (ToxIC) Registry

Affiliations

The Toxicology Investigators Consortium (ToxIC) Registry

Paul M Wax et al. J Med Toxicol. 2011 Dec.

Abstract

Many medical toxicologists are interested in participating in a practice-based, multicenter research and toxicosurveillance network. In 2009, the American College of Medical Toxicology established the Toxicology Investigators Consortium (ToxIC). One facet of ToxIC is a registry that can be used for surveillance of new or old agents, assessment of treatment decisions, and the creation of new research questions. This paper describes the development of and the initial experiences with this registry of toxicology patients. In November 2009, ACMT invited members to participate in a new registry of cases evaluated and cared for by practicing medical toxicologists who provide direct hands-on clinical care. A password-protected, encrypted, online registry data site was created to upload a newly developed electronic case report form (CRF) on registry patients. The CRF includes demographics; encounter circumstances; agent; syndrome, symptoms, and signs; and treatment. A test version at four sites began in January 2010, seven additional sites were added in March 2010 for the beta phase, and the registry was opened to all interested US medical toxicology practices in April 2010. The CRF underwent continuous modifications based upon frequent feedback from and discussion among the participants. Thirty-three toxicology practice sites, encompassing 56 hospitals and clinics, have entered data into the ToxIC Registry. During the first 14 months of data collection, 5,412 patients were entered. The experience thus far demonstrates that the creation of this registry is feasible and constitutes a potentially powerful toxicosurveillance and robust research tool.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Wax PM, Brent J. The current status of the practice of inpatient medical toxicology at the bedside in the US. Clin Toxicol. 2009;47(7):740.
    1. Black N. Developing high quality clinical databases: the key to a new research paradigm. BMJ. 1997;315(7105):381. doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7105.381. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Whyte IM. Introduction: research in clinical toxicology—the value of high quality data. Clin Toxicol. 2002;40(3):211–212. doi: 10.1081/CLT-120005490. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dreyer NA, Garner S. Registries for robust evidence. JAMA. 2009;302(7):790–791. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1092. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kleinschmidt K, Wax P, Nelson L, Bird S, Brent J. The Toxicology Investigators Consortium (ToxIC) Registry—establishing its viability. Clin Toxicol. 2010;48(6):651.