Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Dec;52(12):2304-2313.
doi: 10.1194/jlr.P016816. Epub 2011 Sep 26.

LDL-apheresis depletes apoE-HDL and pre-β1-HDL in familial hypercholesterolemia: relevance to atheroprotection

Affiliations

LDL-apheresis depletes apoE-HDL and pre-β1-HDL in familial hypercholesterolemia: relevance to atheroprotection

Alexina Orsoni et al. J Lipid Res. 2011 Dec.

Abstract

Subnormal HDL-cholesterol (HDL-C) and apolipoprotein (apo)AI levels are characteristic of familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), reflecting perturbed intravascular metabolism with compositional anomalies in HDL particles, including apoE enrichment. Does LDL-apheresis, which reduces HDL-cholesterol, apoAI, and apoE by adsorption, induce selective changes in HDL subpopulations, with relevance to atheroprotection? Five HDL subpopulations were fractionated from pre- and post-LDL-apheresis plasmas of normotriglyceridemic FH subjects (n = 11) on regular LDL-apheresis (>2 years). Apheresis lowered both plasma apoE (-62%) and apoAI (-16%) levels, with preferential, genotype-independent reduction in apoE. The mass ratio of HDL2:HDL3 was lowered from ~1:1 to 0.72:1 by apheresis, reflecting selective removal of HDL2 mass (80% of total HDL adsorbed). Pre-LDL-apheresis, HDL2 subpopulations were markedly enriched in apoE, consistent with ~1 copy of apoE per 4 HDL particles. Large amounts (50-66%) of apoE-HDL were removed by apheresis, preferentially in the HDL2b subfraction (-50%); minor absolute amounts of apoE-HDL were removed from HDL3 subfractions. Furthermore, pre-β1-HDL particle levels were subnormal following removal (-53%) upon apheresis, suggesting that cellular cholesterol efflux may be defective in the immediate postapheresis period. In LDL-receptor (LDL-R) deficiency, LDL-apheresis may enhance flux through the reverse cholesterol transport pathway and equally attenuate potential biglycan-mediated deposition of apoE-HDL in the arterial matrix.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Bar graphs showing (A) apoE concentration in total HDL (n = 11), (B) apoE concentration in each density gradient HDL subfraction (n = 8), and (C) apoE:apoAI ratio in each density gradient HDL subfraction (n = 8) in normolipidemic subjects (dashed bar, n = 6), in FH patients before (open bar) and after (closed bar) LDL-apheresis. Values are means ± SEM. ***P < 0.001, **0.001 < P < 0.01, and *0.01 < P < 0.05 versus before LDL-apheresis.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Bar graph showing the plasma concentrations of HDL subspecies in FH patients (n = 11) before (open bar) and after (closed bar) LDL-apheresis. HDL2b (d = 1.063-1.091 g/ml); HDL2a (d = 1.091-1.110 g/ml); HDL3a (d = 1.110-1.133 g/ml); HDL3b (d = 1.133-1.156 g/ml); HDL3c (d = 1.156-1.179 g/ml). Insert: Bar graph showing the reduction in absolute mass concentration HDL subspecies after LDL-apheresis in FH patients (n = 11). Values are means ± SEM. ***P < 0.001, **0.001 < P < 0.01 and *0.01 < P < 0.05 versus before LDL-apheresis.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Bar graph showing the plasma concentrations of pre-β1-HDL in normolipidemic subjects (dashed bar; n = 25), in FH patients (n = 10) before (open bar) and after (closed bar) LDL-apheresis. Values are means ± SEM. ***P < 0.001, *0.01 < P < 0.05.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Bar graphs demonstrating the changes in HDL proteome upon apheresis. A: Relative changes in the HDL proteome FH patients (n = 10) after apheresis. Bars in red reached a statistical significance change (P < 0.05). B: Absolute levels (peak areas) preapheresis (open bars) and postapheresis (black bars) of the statistically significant changes (Bonferroni corrected). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.001.

References

    1. Goldstein J. L., Hobbs H. H., Brown M. S. 2001. Familial hypercholesterolemia. The Metabolic Basis of Inherited Disease. Scriver C. R., Beaudet A. L., Sly W. S., Valle D., McGraw-Hill, New York: 2863–2913.
    1. Gordon D. J., Probstfield J. L., Garrison R. J., Neaton J. D., Castelli W. P., Knoke J. D., Jacobs D. R., Bangdiwala S., Tyroler H. A. 1989. High-density lipoprotein cholesterol and cardiovascular disease. Four prospective American studies. Circulation. 79: 8–15. - PubMed
    1. The Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration. 2009. Major lipids, apolipoproteins, and risk of vascular disease. JAMA. 302: 1993–2000. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chapman M. J., Ginsberg H. N., Amarenco P., Andreotti F., Borén J., Catapano A. L., Descamps O. S., Fisher E., Kovanen P. T., Kuivenhoven J. A., et al. 2011. Triglyceride-rich lipoproteins and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in patients at high risk of cardiovascular disease: evidence and guidance for management. Eur. Heart J. 32: 1345–1361. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bellanger N., Orsoni A., Julia Z., Fournier N., Frisdal E., Duchene E., Bruckert E., Carrie A., Bonnefont-Rousselot D., Pirault J., et al. 2011. Atheroprotective reverse cholesterol transport pathway is defective in familial hypercholesterolemia. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 31: 1675–1681. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources