Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2010 Dec;78(12):652-9.

[Intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection (IMSI) vs intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in patients with repeated ICSI failure]

[Article in Spanish]
Affiliations
  • PMID: 21961371
Clinical Trial

[Intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection (IMSI) vs intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in patients with repeated ICSI failure]

[Article in Spanish]
Claudia González-Ortega et al. Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2010 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) is highly effective for the control of male factor infertility. The sperm selected for ICSI may have structural abnormalities undetectable to 400x as nuclear vacuoles, decreasing rates of pregnancy and implantation. Recent studies show that with intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection (IMSI), at higher magnification (> 6,600x), increases pregnancy and implantation rates in patients with repeated failure to ICSI.

Objective: To compare the results of the injection of selected motile sperm organelle morphology examination (MSOME) for IMSI, instead of the use of ICSI in patients with repeated failure to ICSI.

Patients and method: Prospective, observational cohort study. Since February 1, 2010 was administered IMSI to couples with at least two failed cycles of ICSI, and analyzed the first 30 cycles in patients under 38 years of good ovarian reserve. This study group was compared with the last 30 cycles of ICSI performed before that date, in patients with similar clinical characteristics. The IMSI was performed with a magnification of 7,676 increases for evaluation and sperm selection.

Results: The groups had similar clinical characteristics. The pregnancy rate with IMSI was better than with ICSI (63 vs. 50%), the difference was not significant for the size of the sample, although the trend is clear and clinically significant in favor to IMSI. The implantation rate with IMSI (44.8%) showed statistically significant differences vs. ICSI (29.7%). No significant differences in abortion rates.

Conclusions: IMSI significantly improves the implantation rate in patients with repeated failure to ICSI.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by