Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Sep 30:11:245.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-245.

Evaluating complex interventions and health technologies using normalization process theory: development of a simplified approach and web-enabled toolkit

Affiliations

Evaluating complex interventions and health technologies using normalization process theory: development of a simplified approach and web-enabled toolkit

Carl R May et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: Normalization Process Theory (NPT) can be used to explain implementation processes in health care relating to new technologies and complex interventions. This paper describes the processes by which we developed a simplified version of NPT for use by clinicians, managers, and policy makers, and which could be embedded in a web-enabled toolkit and on-line users manual.

Methods: Between 2006 and 2010 we undertook four tasks. (i) We presented NPT to potential and actual users in multiple workshops, seminars, and presentations. (ii) Using what we discovered from these meetings, we decided to create a simplified set of statements and explanations expressing core constructs of the theory (iii) We circulated these statements to a criterion sample of 60 researchers, clinicians and others, using SurveyMonkey to collect qualitative textual data about their criticisms of the statements. (iv) We then reconstructed the statements and explanations to meet users' criticisms, embedded them in a web-enabled toolkit, and beta tested this 'in the wild'.

Results: On-line data collection was effective: over a four week period 50/60 participants responded using SurveyMonkey (40/60) or direct phone and email contact (10/60). An additional nine responses were received from people who had been sent the SurveyMonkey form by other respondents. Beta testing of the web enabled toolkit produced 13 responses, from 327 visits to http://www.normalizationprocess.org. Qualitative analysis of both sets of responses showed a high level of support for the statements but also showed that some statements poorly expressed their underlying constructs or overlapped with others. These were rewritten to take account of users' criticisms and then embedded in a web-enabled toolkit. As a result we were able translate the core constructs into a simplified set of statements that could be utilized by non-experts.

Conclusion: Normalization Process Theory has been developed through transparent procedures at each stage of its life. The theory has been shown to be sufficiently robust to merit formal testing. This project has provided a user friendly version of NPT that can be embedded in a web-enabled toolkit and used as a heuristic device to think through implementation and integration problems.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
NPT Toolkit - Web-interface - Sliding Toolbar.
Figure 2
Figure 2
NPT Toolkit - Reporting page - Individual Radar Plots for each Construct.

References

    1. Campbell M, Fitzpatrick R, Haines A, Kinmonth A, Sandercock P, Spiegelhalter D, Tyrer P. Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. BMJ. 2000;321:694–696. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7262.694. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Campbell NC, Murray E, Darbyshire J, Emery J, Farmer A, Griffiths F, Guthrie B, Lester H, Wilson P, Kinmonth AL. Designing and evaluating complex interventions to improve health care. Brit Med J. 2007;334(7591):455–459. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39108.379965.BE. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Angus D, Brouwers M, Driedger M, Eccles M, Francis J, Godin G, Graham I, Grimshaw J, Hanna S, Harrison MB. et al. Designing theoretically-informed implementation interventions The Improved Clinical Effectiveness through Behavioural Research Group (ICEBeRG) Implement Sci. 2006;1 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Grol RP, Bosch M, Hulscher M, Eccles M, Wensing M. Planning and studying improvement in patient care: the use of theoretical perspectives. Milbank Quarterly. 2007;85(1):93–138. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2007.00478.x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Goldthorpe JH. On Sociology: Critique and Program. Stanford: Stanford University Press; 2006.

Publication types

MeSH terms