The hematocrit level in upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage: safety of endoscopy and outcomes
- PMID: 21962318
- DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.04.032
The hematocrit level in upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage: safety of endoscopy and outcomes
Abstract
Objective: In patients with acute upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage, standard practice is to transfuse packed red blood cells, often to an arbitrary level of hemoglobin or hematocrit (typically 10 g/dL and 30%, respectively) before endoscopy. Therefore, we aimed to determine first whether performing endoscopy in patients with upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage and a low hematocrit is safe and whether it predicts outcomes.
Methods: This cohort study included patients with carefully defined upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage captured in our gastrointestinal Healthcare Registry who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Patients were placed into 2 groups: low hematocrit (<30%) or high hematocrit (>30%). Clinical variables and outcomes, including cardiovascular events, intensive care unit transfer, and death, were measured.
Results: A total of 920 patients meeting entry criteria were identified. Baseline features among those with a low and high hematocrit were identical. Eight cardiovascular events occurred during or after esophagogastroduodenoscopy, including 5 of 587 (1%) in the less than 30% hematocrit group and 3 of 333 (1%) in the greater than 30% hematocrit group (P=.29). Blood transfusions were more common in the low hematocrit group (74% vs 24%, P<.001). However, correlation between the amount of blood transfused and hematocrit level was poor, and the number units of blood transfused was highly variable. There was no significant mortality difference in the 2 hematocrit groups.
Conclusion: Most patients with upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage presented with a hematocrit less than 30%. Performing endoscopy in patients with a low hematocrit was clearly safe; these data strongly imply that waiting for the hematocrit to reach a certain level before endoscopy is not necessary.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Simple clinical predictors may obviate urgent endoscopy in selected patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding.Arch Intern Med. 2007 Feb 12;167(3):265-70. doi: 10.1001/archinte.167.3.265. Arch Intern Med. 2007. PMID: 17296882
-
Efficacy of recombinant human erythropoietin in critically ill patients admitted to a long-term acute care facility: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.Crit Care Med. 2006 Sep;34(9):2310-6. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000233873.17954.42. Crit Care Med. 2006. PMID: 16878035 Clinical Trial.
-
Risk scoring systems to predict need for clinical intervention for patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding.Am J Emerg Med. 2007 Sep;25(7):774-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2006.12.024. Am J Emerg Med. 2007. PMID: 17870480
-
An evaluation of endoscopic indications and findings related to nonvariceal upper-GI hemorrhage in a large multicenter consortium.Gastrointest Endosc. 2008 Mar;67(3):422-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.09.024. Epub 2008 Jan 18. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008. PMID: 18206878
-
Transfusion of Packed Red Blood Cells--The Indications Have Changed.S D Med. 2015 Dec;68(12):542-5. S D Med. 2015. PMID: 26793932 Review.
Cited by
-
Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2020 Jan;33(1):42-44. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1695037. Epub 2019 Nov 20. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2020. PMID: 31915425 Free PMC article. Review.
-
To transfuse or not to transfuse in upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage? That is the question.Hepatology. 2014 Jul;60(1):422-4. doi: 10.1002/hep.26994. Epub 2014 May 29. Hepatology. 2014. PMID: 24390775 Free PMC article.
-
Changing Epidemiology of Upper Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage in the Last Decade: A Nationwide Analysis.Dig Dis Sci. 2018 May;63(5):1286-1293. doi: 10.1007/s10620-017-4882-6. Epub 2017 Dec 27. Dig Dis Sci. 2018. PMID: 29282637
-
Upper gastrointestinal bleeding caused by severe esophagitis: a unique clinical syndrome.Dig Dis Sci. 2014 Dec;59(12):2997-3003. doi: 10.1007/s10620-014-3258-4. Epub 2014 Oct 2. Dig Dis Sci. 2014. PMID: 25274156
-
Evaluation for Perioperative Blood Transfusion during Major Abdominal Procedures in a Pediatric Population: A Retrospective Observation Cohort Study.Transfus Med Hemother. 2020 Feb;47(1):68-74. doi: 10.1159/000497826. Epub 2019 Mar 25. Transfus Med Hemother. 2020. PMID: 32110196 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical