African American patients seeking treatment in the public sector: characteristics of buprenorphine vs. methadone patients
- PMID: 21962726
- PMCID: PMC3251709
- DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2011.09.009
African American patients seeking treatment in the public sector: characteristics of buprenorphine vs. methadone patients
Abstract
Background: To expand its public-sector treatment capacity, Baltimore City made buprenorphine treatment accessible to low-income, largely African American residents. This study compares the characteristics of patients entering methadone treatment vs. buprenorphine treatment to determine whether BT was attracting different types of patients.
Methods: Participants consisted of two samples of adult heroin-dependent African Americans. The first sample was newly admitted to a health center or a mental health center providing buprenorphine (N=200), and the second sample was newly admitted to one of two hospital-based methadone programs (N=178). The Addiction Severity Index (ASI) and the Friends Supplemental Questionnaire were administered at treatment entry and data were analyzed with logistic regression.
Results: BT participants were more likely to be female (p=.017) and less likely to inject (p=.001). Participants with only prior buprenorphine treatment experience were nearly five time more likely to enter buprenorphine than methadone treatment (p<.001). Those with experience with both treatments were more than twice as likely to enter BT (OR=2.7, 95% CI=1.11-6.62; p=.028). In the 30 days prior to treatment entry, BT participants reported more days of medical problems (p=.002) and depression (p=.044), and were more likely to endorse a lifetime history of depression (p<.001).
Conclusion: Methadone and buprenorphine treatment provided in the public sector may attract different patient subpopulations. Providing buprenorphine treatment through drug treatment programs co-located with a health and mental health center may have accounted for their higher rates of medical and psychiatric problems and appears to be useful in attracting a diverse group of patients into public-sector funded treatment.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Dr. O’Grady has consulted with Reckitt Benckiser Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Other authors report no conflicts of interest.
References
- 
    - Auriacombe M, Fatseas M, Dubernet J, Daulouede JP, Tignol J. French field experience with buprenorphine. Am J Addict. 2004;13(Suppl 1):S17–28. - PubMed
 
- 
    - Beschner GM, Walters JM. Just another habit? Heroin users’ perspective on treatment. In: Hanson B, Beschner G, Walters JM, Bovelle E, editors. Life With Heroin: Voices from the Inner City. Lexington Books; Lexington, Mass: 1985.
 
- 
    - Comer SD, Sullivan MA, Hulse GK. Sustained-release naltrexone: novel treatment for opioid dependence. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2007;16:1285–1294. - PubMed
 
- 
    - Jaffe JH, O’Keeffe C. From morphine clinics to buprenorphine: regulating opioid agonist treatment of addiction in the United States. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2003;70(Suppl 2):S3–S11. - PubMed
 
- 
    - Ling W, Casadonte P, Bigelow G, Kampman KM, Patkar A, Bailey GL, Rosenthal RN, Beebe KL. Buprenorphine implants for treatment of opioid dependence: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2010;304:1576–1583. - PubMed
 
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
- Full Text Sources
- Medical
 
        