Oral and nonoral sensorimotor interventions facilitate suck-swallow-respiration functions and their coordination in preterm infants
- PMID: 21962771
- PMCID: PMC3262089
- DOI: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2011.09.007
Oral and nonoral sensorimotor interventions facilitate suck-swallow-respiration functions and their coordination in preterm infants
Abstract
Background: Preterm infants are at high risk of encountering oral feeding difficulties. Early sensorimotor interventions may improve oral feeding skills in preterm infants.
Aim: To further explore the effects of an oral (O), tactile/kinesthetic (T/K), and combined (O+T/K) sensorimotor intervention on preterm infants' nutritive sucking, swallowing and their coordination with respiration.
Study design: Seventy-five infants (29 [0.3, standard error of mean, SEM] weeks gestation, 49 males/26 females) were randomly assigned to an O group involving sensorimotor input to the oral structures; a T/K group involving sensorimotor input to the trunk and limbs; a combined (O+T/K) group; and a control group.
Outcome measures: Stage of sucking, suction and expression amplitudes (mmHg), suck-swallow ratio, stability of suck-swallow interval, and swallow-respiration patterns.
Results: The O group had significantly more advanced sucking stages, and greater suction and expression amplitudes than controls [p≤0.035, effect size (ES) >0.6]. The suck-swallow ratio and stability of suck-swallow intervals did not significantly differ among groups (p≥0.181, ES≤0.3). The three interventions led to fewer swallows bracketed by prolonged respiratory pauses compared to controls (pause-swallow-pause, p≤0.044, ES≥0.7). The T/K and combined (O+T/K) groups had greater occurrence of swallows bracketed by expiration than the control and O groups (expiration-swallow-expiration, p≤0.039, ES≥0.3).
Conclusion: The O intervention enhanced specific components of nutritive sucking. All three interventions resulted in improved swallow-respiration coordination. Sensorimotor interventions have distributed beneficial effects that go beyond the specific target of input.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors do not have any conflict of interest to disclose.
Figures
References
-
- McGrath JM, Braescu AV. State of the science: feeding readiness in the preterm infant. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2004;18:353–368. - PubMed
-
- Collins CT, Makrides M, McPhee AJ. Early discharge with home support of gavage feeding for stable preterm infants who have not established full oral feeds. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;4 CD003743. - PubMed
-
- Fucile S, Gisel EG, Lau C. Effect of an oral stimulation program on sucking skill maturation of preterm infants. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2005;47:158–162. - PubMed
-
- Barlow SM, Dusick A, Finan DS, Coltart S, Biswas A. Mechanically evoked perioral reflexes in premature and term human infants. Brain Res. 2001;899:251–254. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
