Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Aug;204(8):447-57.
doi: 10.1016/j.cancergen.2011.07.009.

Long-range massively parallel mate pair sequencing detects distinct mutations and similar patterns of structural mutability in two breast cancer cell lines

Affiliations

Long-range massively parallel mate pair sequencing detects distinct mutations and similar patterns of structural mutability in two breast cancer cell lines

Oliver A Hampton et al. Cancer Genet. 2011 Aug.

Erratum in

  • Cancer Genet. 2011 Dec;204(12):694. Coarfa, Cristian [added];Schoenherr, Caroline [added]

Abstract

Cancer genomes frequently undergo genomic instability resulting in accumulation of chromosomal rearrangement. To date, one of the main challenges has been to confidently and accurately identify these rearrangements by using short-read massively parallel sequencing. We were able to improve cancer rearrangement detection by combining two distinct massively parallel sequencing strategies: fosmid-sized (36 kb on average) and standard 5 kb mate pair libraries. We applied this combined strategy to map rearrangements in two breast cancer cell lines, MCF7 and HCC1954. We detected and validated a total of 91 somatic rearrangements in MCF7 and 25 in HCC1954, including genomic alterations corresponding to previously reported transcript aberrations in these two cell lines. Each of the genomes contains two types of breakpoints: clustered and dispersed. In both cell lines, the dispersed breakpoints show enrichment for low copy repeats, while the clustered breakpoints associate with high copy number amplifications. Comparing the two genomes, we observed highly similar structural mutational spectra affecting different sets of genes, pointing to similar histories of genomic instability against the background of very different gene network perturbations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(A) Circular visualizations of the MCF7 and HCC1954 genomes obtained using Circos [52] software. Chromosomes are individually colored with centromeres in white. Copy number variation is plotted with gains in blue and losses in red. The colored rearrangements depict breast cancer-specific somatic mutations from the combined fosmid-sized and 5Kb mate pair libraries. Green lines denote intrachromosomal and purple lines denote interchromosomal rearrangements. (B) Venn diagrams comparing the numbers of fosmid-sized and 5Kb mate pair rearrangements, PCR primer designs, PCR assays that produced breakpoint amplicon versus no amplification product, and rearrangements that are validated as breast cancer-specific mutation versus normal structural variation in the MCF7 and HCC1954 genomes.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A) Arc visualizations of the largest MCF7 and HCC1954 breakpoint cliques and their association with copy number amplification. Chromosome cytobands are shaded and labeled. The colored rearrangements depict breast tumor intrachromosomal (green) and interchromosomal (purple) mutations. Copy number counts are plotted with gains in blue, losses in red, and normal diploid in grey (count scales are from zero to MCF7: max = 60; HCC1954: max = 15). (B) MCF7 and HCC1954 log2 copy number plots of Affymetrix 100k SNP chip arrays [34] (top) and Illumina mate pair mapped sequence counts (bottom); gains are plotted in blue, losses in red, and normal diploid in grey. Highlighted regions correspond to the largest breakpoint cliques from A.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bignell GR, Santarius T, Pole JC, Butler AP, Perry J, Pleasance E, Greenman C, Menzies A, Taylor S, Edkins S, Campbell P, Quail M, Plumb B, Matthews L, McLay K, Edwards PA, Rogers J, Wooster R, Futreal PA, Stratton MR. Architectures of somatic genomic rearrangement in human cancer amplicons at sequence-level resolution. Genome Res. 2007;17:1296–303. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kidd JM, Cooper GM, Donahue WF, Hayden HS, Sampas N, Graves T, Hansen N, Teague B, Alkan C, Antonacci F, Haugen E, Zerr T, Yamada NA, Tsang P, Newman TL, Tuzun E, Cheng Z, Ebling HM, Tusneem N, David R, Gillett W, Phelps KA, Weaver M, Saranga D, Brand A, Tao W, Gustafson E, McKernan K, Chen L, Malig M, Smith JD, Korn JM, McCarroll SA, Altshuler DA, Peiffer DA, Dorschner M, Stamatoyannopoulos J, Schwartz D, Nickerson DA, Mullikin JC, Wilson RK, Bruhn L, Olson MV, Kaul R, Smith DR, Eichler EE. Mapping and sequencing of structural variation from eight human genomes. Nature. 2008;453:56–64. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tuzun E, Sharp AJ, Bailey JA, Kaul R, Morrison VA, Pertz LM, Haugen E, Hayden H, Albertson D, Pinkel D, Olson MV, Eichler EE. Fine-scale structural variation of the human genome. Nat Genet. 2005;37:727–32. - PubMed
    1. Volik S, Raphael BJ, Huang G, Stratton MR, Bignel G, Murnane J, Brebner JH, Bajsarowicz K, Paris PL, Tao Q, Kowbel D, Lapuk A, Shagin DA, Shagina IA, Gray JW, Cheng JF, de Jong PJ, Pevzner P, Collins C. Decoding the fine-scale structure of a breast cancer genome and transcriptome. Genome Res. 2006 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Volik S, Zhao S, Chin K, Brebner JH, Herndon DR, Tao Q, Kowbel D, Huang G, Lapuk A, Kuo WL, Magrane G, De Jong P, Gray JW, Collins C. End-sequence profiling: sequence-based analysis of aberrant genomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:7696–701. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types