Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Oct 1;184(7):848-56.
doi: 10.1164/rccm.201104-0634WS.

Comparative effectiveness research in lung diseases and sleep disorders: recommendations from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute workshop

Collaborators, Affiliations

Comparative effectiveness research in lung diseases and sleep disorders: recommendations from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute workshop

Tracy A Lieu et al. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. .

Abstract

The Division of Lung Diseases of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) held a workshop to develop recommendations on topics, methodologies, and resources for comparative effectiveness research (CER) that will guide clinical decision making about available treatment options for lung diseases and sleep disorders. A multidisciplinary group of experts with experience in efficacy, effectiveness, implementation, and economic research identified (a) what types of studies the domain of CER in lung diseases and sleep disorders should include, (b) the criteria and process for setting priorities, and (c) current resources for and barriers to CER in lung diseases. Key recommendations were to (1) increase efforts to engage stakeholders in developing CER questions and study designs; (2) invest in further development of databases and other infrastructure, including efficient methods for data sharing; (3) make full use of a broad range of study designs; (4) increase the appropriate use of observational designs and the support of methodologic research; (5) ensure that committees that review CER grant applications include persons with appropriate perspective and expertise; and (6) further develop the workforce for CER by supporting training opportunities that focus on the methodologic and practical skills needed.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Iglehart JK. Prioritizing comparative-effectiveness research–IOM recommendations. N Engl J Med 2009;361:325–328 - PubMed
    1. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Comparative Effectiveness Research Prioritization. Initial national priorities for comparative effectiveness research. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press; 2009
    1. Clancy C, Collins FS. Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute: the intersection of science and health care. Sci Transl Med 2010;2:37cm18 - PubMed
    1. Lauer MS, Collins FS. Using science to improve the nation's health system: NIH's commitment to comparative effectiveness research. JAMA 2010;303:2182–2183 - PubMed
    1. Federal Coordinating Council for Comparative Effectiveness Research (US) Report to the President and the Congress. Washington, DC: US Dept. of Health and Human Services; 2009

Publication types

MeSH terms