Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011;6(9):e24915.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024915. Epub 2011 Sep 26.

The A-current modulates learning via NMDA receptors containing the NR2B subunit

Affiliations

The A-current modulates learning via NMDA receptors containing the NR2B subunit

Ángela Fontán-Lozano et al. PLoS One. 2011.

Abstract

Synaptic plasticity involves short- and long-term events, although the molecular mechanisms that underlie these processes are not fully understood. The transient A-type K(+) current (I(A)) controls the excitability of the dendrites from CA1 pyramidal neurons by regulating the back-propagation of action potentials and shaping synaptic input. Here, we have studied how decreases in I(A) affect cognitive processes and synaptic plasticity. Using wild-type mice treated with 4-AP, an I(A) inhibitor, and mice lacking the DREAM protein, a transcriptional repressor and modulator of the I(A), we demonstrate that impairment of I(A) decreases the stimulation threshold for learning and the induction of early-LTP. Hippocampal electrical recordings in both models revealed alterations in basal electrical oscillatory properties toward low-theta frequencies. In addition, we demonstrated that the facilitated learning induced by decreased I(A) requires the activation of NMDA receptors containing the NR2B subunit. Together, these findings point to a balance between the I(A) and the activity of NR2B-containing NMDA receptors in the regulation of learning.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Kv4.2 expression and IA activity are reduced in the hippocampus of dream−/− mice.
Basal expression of kv4.2 mRNA (A) and Kv4.2 protein (B) in the hippocampus of wt (white bars) and dream−/− (gray bars) mice. Gapdh mRNA and actin protein served as internal controls. (C) The two-step voltage clamp protocol used to activate whole-cell voltage-dependent K+ currents, and representative examples of the outward currents in CA1 pyramidal neurons from wt and dream−/− mice. The first depolarizing step activated a mixed current (ITotal) with a transient A-type component (IA; asterisks) and sustained non-inactivating K+ current (IKDR). IA was inactivated during the second depolarizing pulse (arrowheads) leaving only the sustained IKDR. (D) Traces on the left show the superimposition of the sequential outward current responses (depolarizing pulse segments) illustrated in C. Traces on the right show IA current traces calculated by subtracting IKDR from ITotal for the same neurons. (E) Summary data comparing the peak current density (amplitude normalized to cell capacitance) of IA and IKDR in wt and mutant neurons (n = 30 and 23 neurons from 6 mice of each genotype, respectively). * p<0.05, ** p≤0.01.
Figure 2
Figure 2. The reduction of IA facilitates learning in the object recognition test.
(A, B) The object recognition memory test was performed using a 5 min training session in wt (white bars) and dream−/− (gray bars) mice. Discrimination indices during short-term memory (STM, A) and long-term memory (LTM, B) sessions (1 and 24 h after training, respectively) are shown. Administration of anisomycin (aniso, black pointed bars) before the training sessions blocked the facilitation of LTM in dream−/− mice. (C, D) Administration of 4-AP before the training sessions facilitated short-term memory (STM) in wt mice. Discrimination indices during STM (C), and LTM (D) sessions are shown. n = at least 8 per group. ** p<0.01.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Kv4.2 channel blockade induces alterations in basal oscillatory hippocampal activity.
(A) Power spectra of hippocampal local field activity recorded from the CA1 pyramidal layer of wt, dream−/− and 4-AP-treated wt mice during exploratory behavior. Two seconds of the basal electrocorticogram recordings are also shown. (B) Relative spectrum quantification (mean ± SEM) in the low theta and theta ranges for wt, dream −/− and 4-AP-treated mice. n = 6 per group. * p≤0.05, ** p≤0.01.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Reduced IA decreases the stimulus threshold for short-term synaptic plasticity.
(A) A single high-frequency stimulation (HFS, five trains, 200 Hz, 100 ms, at a rate of 1/s) evoked LTP at the CA3-CA1 synapse, lasting for up to 2 h in dream−/− mice (gray symbols). Anisomycin administration (white symbols) before HFS reduced the extension of LTP. A summary of the percent change in the fEPSP slope (mean ± SEM) and representative recordings at different times after a single HFS train in wt and dream−/− mice, in the presence or absence of anisomycin, is shown. (B) Effect of 4-AP administration on high-frequency stimulation (HFS) in wt mice. 4-AP administration evoked lasting short-term potentiation in wt mice. A summary of the changes in the fEPSP slope (mean ± SEM) and representative recordings at different times after a single HFS pulse in vehicle and 4-AP-treated mice is shown. n = 6 per group. *p≤0.05, ** p≤0.01.
Figure 5
Figure 5. The facilitation of learning induced by decreased IA is mediated by NR2B-containing NMDA receptors.
The object recognition memory test was performed with a 5 min training session in dream−/− mice pretreated with Ro26-6981 or the vehicle alone (left graph, white and black bars, respectively), and in mice pretreated with 4-AP-treated in the presence or absence of Ro25-6981 (right graph). The discrimination indices during short-term memory (STM) are shown. n = at least 8 per group. * p≤0.05, *** p≤0.001.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kandel ER. The molecular biology of memory storage: a dialogue between genes and synapses. Science. 2001;294:1030–1038. - PubMed
    1. Dudai Y. The neurobiology of consolidations, or, how stable is the engram? Annu Rev Psychol. 2004;55:51–86. - PubMed
    1. Kelleher RJ, 3rd, Govindarajan A, Tonegawa S. Translational regulatory mechanisms in persistent forms of synaptic plasticity. Neuron. 2004;44:59–73. - PubMed
    1. Klann E, Dever TE. Biochemical mechanisms for translational regulation in synaptic plasticity. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2004;5:931–942. - PubMed
    1. Inda MC, Delgado-García JM, Carrión AM. Acquisition, consolidation, reconsolidation, and extinction of eyelid conditioning response require de novo protein synthesis. J Neurosci. 2005;25:2070–2080. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types