How do they compare?: an assessment of predeployment fitness in the Arizona National Guard
- PMID: 21969079
- DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31822dfba8
How do they compare?: an assessment of predeployment fitness in the Arizona National Guard
Abstract
Currently, there is a paucity of literature that describes physical fitness levels in deploying service members. There has been no data collected that evaluate the Army National Guard or Reserves. This descriptive study will provide physical fitness data for soldiers in the Arizona National Guard (AZNG), allowing for a comparison between the active and reserve components. Sixty soldiers from the AZNG were tested before deployment. Body composition was measured by using air displacement plethysmography. Flexibility testing included the sit and reach (SNR), trunk extension (TE), and shoulder elevation (SE) assessments. Muscular strength was determined by the completion of 1 repetition maximum (1RM) bench press and back squat. Muscular endurance was determined by the completion of the Army push-up (P/U) and sit-up (S/U) test. Muscular power was assessed by the completion of the Wingate cycle test and the standing broad jump (SBJ). Cardiorespiratory fitness was determined by the completion of a VO2peak test. The AZNG soldiers demonstrated a fat mass of 22.7 ± 8.9%, SNR, TE, and SE of 30.0 ± 8.9, 117.1 ± 25.2, and 145.5 ± 50.3 cm, 1RM bench press and back squat of 82.2 ± 29.9 and 104.6 ± 29.0 kg, P/U and S/U of 50 ± 18 and 53 ± 14 reps, peak power of 660.9 ± 177.8 W, SBJ of 191.8 ± 28.4 cm, and VO2peak of 48.9 ± 8.8 ml·kg(-1)·min(-1). This is the first study that provides descriptive data for physical fitness in a reserve component. The data demonstrate that these AZNG soldiers are relatively fit and have comparable results to their active duty counterparts. This descriptive data will provide military leadership a better understanding of the condition of soldiers before deployment and will assist them in better preparing soldiers for future conflicts.
Similar articles
-
Influence of training frequency on fitness levels and perceived health status in deployed National Guard soldiers.J Strength Cond Res. 2013 Feb;27(2):315-22. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31827e1347. J Strength Cond Res. 2013. PMID: 23222077
-
Associations of maximal strength and muscular endurance test scores with cardiorespiratory fitness and body composition.J Strength Cond Res. 2012 Aug;26(8):2078-86. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31823b06ff. J Strength Cond Res. 2012. PMID: 21997456
-
Physiological profile of women's Lacrosse players.J Strength Cond Res. 2009 Jan;23(1):39-43. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318185f07c. J Strength Cond Res. 2009. PMID: 19002070
-
Secular Trends in the Physical Fitness of United States Army Recruits on Entry to Service, 1975-2013.J Strength Cond Res. 2017 Jul;31(7):2030-2052. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001928. J Strength Cond Res. 2017. PMID: 28403029 Review.
-
Executive Summary From the National Strength and Conditioning Association's Second Blue Ribbon Panel on Military Physical Readiness: Military Physical Performance Testing.J Strength Cond Res. 2015 Nov;29 Suppl 11:S216-20. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001037. J Strength Cond Res. 2015. PMID: 26506191
Cited by
-
A Profile of Knee Injuries Suffered by Australian Army Reserve Soldiers.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Dec 20;16(1):12. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16010012. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018. PMID: 30577566 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous