Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2011 Oct 4;155(7):415-24.
doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-7-201110040-00004.

A prospective evaluation of a protocol for magnetic resonance imaging of patients with implanted cardiac devices

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

A prospective evaluation of a protocol for magnetic resonance imaging of patients with implanted cardiac devices

Saman Nazarian et al. Ann Intern Med. .

Abstract

Background: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is avoided in most patients with implanted cardiac devices because of safety concerns.

Objective: To define the safety of a protocol for MRI at the commonly used magnetic strength of 1.5 T in patients with implanted cardiac devices.

Design: Prospective nonrandomized trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT01130896) SETTING: One center in the United States (94% of examinations) and one in Israel.

Patients: 438 patients with devices (54% with pacemakers and 46% with defibrillators) who underwent 555 MRI studies.

Intervention: Pacing mode was changed to asynchronous for pacemaker-dependent patients and to demand for others. Tachyarrhythmia functions were disabled. Blood pressure, electrocardiography, oximetry, and symptoms were monitored by a nurse with experience in cardiac life support and device programming who had immediate backup from an electrophysiologist.

Measurements: Activation or inhibition of pacing, symptoms, and device variables.

Results: In 3 patients (0.7% [95% CI, 0% to 1.5%]), the device reverted to a transient back-up programming mode without long-term effects. Right ventricular (RV) sensing (median change, 0 mV [interquartile range {IQR}, -0.7 to 0 V]) and atrial and right and left ventricular lead impedances (median change, -2 Ω [IQR, -13 to 0 Ω], -4 Ω [IQR, -16 to 0 Ω], and -11 Ω [IQR, -40 to 0 Ω], respectively) were reduced immediately after MRI. At long-term follow-up (61% of patients), decreased RV sensing (median, 0 mV, [IQR, -1.1 to 0.3 mV]), decreased RV lead impedance (median, -3 Ω, [IQR, -29 to 15 Ω]), increased RV capture threshold (median, 0 V, IQR, [0 to 0.2 Ω]), and decreased battery voltage (median, -0.01 V, IQR, -0.04 to 0 V) were noted. The observed changes did not require device revision or reprogramming.

Limitations: Not all available cardiac devices have been tested. Long-term in-person or telephone follow-up was unavailable in 43 patients (10%), and some data were missing. Those with missing long-term capture threshold data had higher baseline right atrial and right ventricular capture thresholds and were more likely to have undergone thoracic imaging. Defibrillation threshold testing and random assignment to a control group were not performed.

Conclusion: With appropriate precautions, MRI can be done safely in patients with selected cardiac devices. Because changes in device variables and programming may occur, electrophysiologic monitoring during MRI is essential.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Potential Conflicts of Interest: Disclosures can be viewed at www.acponline.org/authors/icmje/ConflictOfInterestForms.do?msNum=M10-2403.

Figures

Figure
Figure. Safety protocol for MRI in the setting of implanted cardiac devices
DDI = dual-chamber inhibited pacing without atrial tracking; DOO = dual-chamber asynchronous pacing; ECG = electrocardiography; ICD = implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; MRI = magnetic resonance imaging; PVC = premature ventricular contraction; VOO = ventricular asynchronous pacing; VVI = ventricular inhibited pacing. * Adapted from reference .

Comment in

Summary for patients in

References

    1. Kalin R, Stanton MS. Current clinical issues for MRI scanning of pacemaker and defibrillator patients. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2005;28:326–8. - PubMed
    1. Levine GN, Gomes AS, Arai AE, Bluemke DA, Flamm SD, Kanal E, et al. American Heart Association Committee on Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiac Catheterization. Safety of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiovascular devices: an American Heart Association scientific statement from the Committee on Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiac Catheterization, Council on Clinical Cardiology, and the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention: endorsed by the American College of Cardiology Foundation, the North American Society for Cardiac Imaging, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. Circulation. 2007;116:2878–91. - PubMed
    1. Gimbel JR, Johnson D, Levine PA, Wilkoff BL. Safe performance of magnetic resonance imaging on five patients with permanent cardiac pacemakers. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1996;19:913–9. - PubMed
    1. Sommer T, Vahlhaus C, Lauck G, von Smekal A, Reinke M, Hofer U, et al. MR imaging and cardiac pacemakers: in-vitro evaluation and in-vivo studies in 51 patients at 0.5 T. Radiology. 2000;215:869–79. - PubMed
    1. Vahlhaus C, Sommer T, Lewalter T, Schimpf R, Schumacher B, Jung W, et al. Interference with cardiac pacemakers by magnetic resonance imaging: are there irreversible changes at 0. 5 Tesla? Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2001;24:489–95. - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data