Robotic systems in orthopaedic surgery
- PMID: 21969424
- DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.93B10.27418
Robotic systems in orthopaedic surgery
Erratum in
- J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011 Dec;93(12):1679
Abstract
Robots have been used in surgery since the late 1980s. Orthopaedic surgery began to incorporate robotic technology in 1992, with the introduction of ROBODOC, for the planning and performance of total hip replacement. The use of robotic systems has subsequently increased, with promising short-term radiological outcomes when compared with traditional orthopaedic procedures. Robotic systems can be classified into two categories: autonomous and haptic (or surgeon-guided). Passive surgery systems, which represent a third type of technology, have also been adopted recently by orthopaedic surgeons. While autonomous systems have fallen out of favour, tactile systems with technological improvements have become widely used. Specifically, the use of tactile and passive robotic systems in unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) has addressed some of the historical mechanisms of failure of non-robotic UKR. These systems assist with increasing the accuracy of the alignment of the components and produce more consistent ligament balance. Short-term improvements in clinical and radiological outcomes have increased the popularity of robot-assisted UKR. Robot-assisted orthopaedic surgery has the potential for improving surgical outcomes. We discuss the different types of robotic systems available for use in orthopaedics and consider the indication, contraindications and limitations of these technologies.
Similar articles
-
[Robotic systems in orthopedic surgery for rheumatoid arthritis].Nihon Rinsho. 2005 Jan;63 Suppl 1:691-5. Nihon Rinsho. 2005. PMID: 15799444 Review. Japanese. No abstract available.
-
Robotics and computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery.Bull Hosp Jt Dis. 2001-2002;60(3-4):168-72. Bull Hosp Jt Dis. 2001. PMID: 12102405 Review.
-
Haptic robotics enable a systems approach to design of a minimally invasive modular knee arthroplasty.Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2009 Feb;38(2 Suppl):23-7. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2009. PMID: 19340380
-
Design and implementation of a control architecture for robot-assisted orthopaedic surgery.Int J Med Robot. 2010 Mar;6(1):42-56. doi: 10.1002/rcs.287. Int J Med Robot. 2010. PMID: 19943336
-
Robotic arm-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: preoperative planning and surgical technique.Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2009 Feb;38(2 Suppl):10-5. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2009. PMID: 19340377
Cited by
-
[Development and clinical application of robot-assisted technology in traumatic orthopedics].Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2022 Aug 15;36(8):915-922. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202206097. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2022. PMID: 35979779 Free PMC article. Review. Chinese.
-
Robotics in total hip arthroplasty: a review of the evolution, application and evidence base.EFORT Open Rev. 2020 Dec 4;5(12):866-873. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.200037. eCollection 2020 Dec. EFORT Open Rev. 2020. PMID: 33425375 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The current state of robotics in total knee arthroplasty.EFORT Open Rev. 2021 Apr 1;6(4):270-279. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.200052. eCollection 2021 Apr. EFORT Open Rev. 2021. PMID: 34040804 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Alignment options and robotics in total knee arthroplasty.Front Surg. 2023 Feb 9;10:1106608. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1106608. eCollection 2023. Front Surg. 2023. PMID: 36843989 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Efficacy and reliability of active robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty compared with conventional total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Postgrad Med J. 2019 Mar;95(1121):125-133. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2018-136190. Epub 2019 Feb 26. Postgrad Med J. 2019. PMID: 30808721 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources