Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2011 Oct;42(4):561-79.
doi: 10.1044/0161-1461(2011/10-0038).

Narrative ability of children with speech sound disorders and the prediction of later literacy skills

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Narrative ability of children with speech sound disorders and the prediction of later literacy skills

Rachel L Wellman et al. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2011 Oct.

Abstract

Purpose: The main purpose of this study was to examine how children with isolated speech sound disorders (SSDs; n = 20), children with combined SSDs and language impairment (LI; n = 20), and typically developing children (n = 20), ages 3;3 (years;months) to 6;6, differ in narrative ability. The second purpose was to determine if early narrative ability predicts school-age (8-12 years) literacy skills.

Method: This study employed a longitudinal cohort design. The children completed a narrative retelling task before their formal literacy instruction began. The narratives were analyzed and compared for group differences. Performance on these early narratives was then used to predict the children's reading decoding, reading comprehension, and written language ability at school age.

Results: Significant group differences were found in children's (a) ability to answer questions about the story, (b) use of story grammars, and (c) number of correct and irrelevant utterances. Regression analysis demonstrated that measures of story structure and accuracy were the best predictors of the decoding of real words, reading comprehension, and written language. Measures of syntax and lexical diversity were the best predictors of the decoding of nonsense words.

Conclusion: Combined SSDs and LI, and not isolated SSDs, impact a child's narrative abilities. Narrative retelling is a useful task for predicting which children may be at risk for later literacy problems.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Adams AM, Gathercole SE. Phonological working memory and speech production in preschool children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research. 1995;38:403–414. - PubMed
    1. Bird J, Bishop DVM, Freeman NH. Phonological awareness and literacy development in children with expressive phonological impairments. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research. 1995;38:446–462. - PubMed
    1. Bishop DVM, Clarkson B. Written language as a window into residual language deficits: A study of children with persistent and residual speech and language impairments. Cortex. 2003;39:215–237. - PubMed
    1. Bishop DVM, Edmundson A. Language-impaired 4-year-olds: Distinguishing transient from persistent impairment. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders. 1987;52:156–173. - PubMed
    1. Bishop DVM, Snowling MJ. Developmental dyslexia and specific language impairment: Same or different? Psychological Bulletin. 2004;130:858–888. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources