Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Sep 10;75(7):132.
doi: 10.5688/ajpe757132.

Student evaluations of the portfolio process

John E Murphy  1 , Tatum C Airey, Andrea M Bisso, Marion K Slack
Affiliations

Student evaluations of the portfolio process

John E Murphy et al. Am J Pharm Educ. .

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate pharmacy students' perceived benefits of the portfolio process and to gather suggestions for improving the process.

Methods: A questionnaire was designed and administered to 250 first-, second-, and third-year pharmacy students at the University of Arizona College of Pharmacy.

Results: Although the objectives of the portfolio process were for students to understand the expected outcomes, understand the impact of extracurricular activities on attaining competencies, identify what should be learned, identify their strengths and weaknesses, and modify their approach to learning, overall students perceived the portfolio process as having less than moderate benefit. First-year students wanted more examples of portfolios while second- and third-year students suggested that more time with their advisor would be beneficial.

Conclusions: The portfolio process will continue to be refined and efforts made to improve students' perceptions of the process as it is intended to develop the self-assessments skills they will need to improve their knowledge and professional skills throughout their pharmacy careers.

Keywords: assessment; expected outcomes; portfolio; questionnaire; survey.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education. Chicago, IL: 2006. Accreditation standards and guidelines for the professional program in pharmacy leading to the Doctor of Pharmacy degree. http://www.acpe-accredit.org/standards/default.asp. Accessed June 16, 2011.
    1. Ashcroft D, Hall J. Pharmacy students’ attitudes and views about portfolio-based learning: a questionnaire survey. Pharm Educ. 2006;6(1):1–5.
    1. Austin Z, Gregory P. Evaluating the accuracy of pharmacy students’ self-assessment skills. Am J Pharm Educ. 2007;71(5):Article 89. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Plaza CM, Draugalis J, Slack M, et al. Use of reflective portfolios in health sciences education. Am J Pharm Educ. 2007;71(2):Article 34. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tochel C, Haig A, Hesketh A, et al. The effectiveness of portfolios for post-graduate assessment and education BEME Guide No 12. Med Teach. 2009;31(4):299–318. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources