Surgery for high-risk localized prostate cancer
- PMID: 21969847
- PMCID: PMC3175701
- DOI: 10.1177/1756287211418722
Surgery for high-risk localized prostate cancer
Abstract
Treatment of men with high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) remains challenging for urologists. The complex natural history of high-risk PCa and the lack of specific and accurate definitions for high-risk disease impede treatment decision making. Historically, surgery in this patient group has been avoided based on the perception of ostensibly higher complication rates associated with inferior functional and oncological outcomes. To date, no randomized data comparing different therapy approaches have been made available. Several investigators have reported that continence rates in patients after radical prostatectomy (RP) for high-risk disease seem to be unaffected. Similarly, in a large proportion of these men, a nerve-sparing procedure can be performed without a significant negative impact on surgical margin rates and with comparable potency results. Moreover, extended pelvic lymph node dissection (EPLND) contributes to accurate pathological staging with a marginal effect on perioperative morbidity. With regards to the benefits of RP on local recurrence and cure rates, realistic expectations regarding the success of RP alone or in the context of a multimodal approach should be provided during patient counseling.
Keywords: high-risk prostate cancer; perioperative complications; prostatectomy; urinary incontinence.
Figures
References
-
- Agarwal P.K., Sammon J., Bhandari A., Dabaja A., Diaz M., Dusik-Fenton S., et al. (2011) Safety profile of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a standardized report of complications in 3317 patients. Eur Urol in press - PubMed
-
- Allaf M.E., Palapattu G.S., Trock B.J., Carter H.B., Walsh P.C. (2004) Anatomical extent of lymph node dissection: impact on men with clinically localized prostate cancer. J Urol 172: 1840–1844 - PubMed
-
- American Joint Committee on Cancer (2002) AJCC Staging Manual 6th edn Springer: New York
-
- Bader P., Burkhard F.C., Markwalder R., Studer U.E. (2003) Disease progression and survival of patients with positive lymph nodes after radical prostatectomy. Is there a chance of cure? J Urol 169: 849–854 - PubMed
-
- Bastian P.J., Gonzalgo M.L., Aronson W.J., Terris M.K., Kane C.J., Amling C.L., et al. (2006) Clinical and pathologic outcome after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer patients with a preoperative Gleason sum of 8 to 10. Cancer 107: 1265–1272 - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
