Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2011;26 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):369-77.
doi: 10.3233/JAD-2011-0062.

Power calculations for clinical trials in Alzheimer's disease

M Colin Ard  1 , Steven D Edland
Affiliations
Review

Power calculations for clinical trials in Alzheimer's disease

M Colin Ard et al. J Alzheimers Dis. 2011.

Abstract

The Alzheimer research community is actively pursuing novel biomarker and other biologic measures to characterize disease progression or to use as outcome measures in clinical trials. One product of these efforts has been a large literature reporting power calculations and estimates of sample size for planning future clinical trials and cohort studies with longitudinal rate of change outcome measures. Sample size estimates reported in this literature vary greatly depending on a variety of factors, including the statistical methods and model assumptions used in their calculation. We review this literature and suggest standards for reporting power calculation results. Regardless of the statistical methods used, studies consistently find that volumetric neuroimaging measures of regions of interest, such as hippocampal volume, outperform global cognitive scales traditionally used in clinical treatment trials in terms of the number of subjects required to detect a fixed percentage slowing of the rate of change observed in demented and cognitively impaired populations. However, statistical methods, model assumptions, and parameter estimates used in power calculations are often not reported in sufficient detail to be of maximum utility. We review the factors that influence sample size estimates, and discuss outstanding issues relevant to planning longitudinal studies of Alzheimer's disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Mueller SG, Weiner MW, Thal LJ, Petersen RC, Jack CR, Jagust W, Trojanowski JQ, Toga AW, Beckett L. Ways toward an early diagnosis in Alzheimer’s disease: the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) Alzheimers Dement. 2005;1:55–66. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Weiner MW, Aisen PS, Jack CR, Jr, Jagust WJ, Trojanowski JQ, Shaw L, Saykin AJ, Morris JC, Cairns N, Beckett LA, Toga A, Green R, Walter S, Soares H, Snyder P, Siemers E, Potter W, Cole PE, Schmidt M. The Alzheimer’s disease neuroimaging initiative: progress report and future plans. Alzheimers Dement. 2010;6:202–211. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ashford JW, Adamson M, Beale T, La D, Hernandez B, Noda A, Rosen A, O’Hara R, Fairchild JK, Spielman D, Yesavage JA. MR spectroscopy for assessment of memantine treatment in mild to moderate Alzheimer dementia. In: Ashford JW, et al., editors. Handbook of Imaging the Alzheimer Brain. IOS Press; Amsterdam: 2011. pp. 599–604. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Förster S, Buschert VC, Buchholz HG, Teipel SJ, Friese U, Zach Ca, Fougere C, Rominger A, Drzezga A, Hampel H, Bartenstein P, Buerger K. Effects of a 6-month cognitive intervention program on brain metabolism in amnestic MCI and mild Alzheimer’s disease. In. In: Ashford JW, et al., editors. Handbook of Imaging the Alzheimer Brain. IOS Press; Amsterdam: 2011. pp. 605–616. - PubMed
    1. Aisen PS, Petersen RC, Donohue MC, Gamst A, Raman R, Thomas RG, Walter S, Trojanowski JQ, Shaw LM, Beckett LA, Jack CR, Jr, Jagust W, Toga AW, Saykin AJ, Morris JC, Green RC, Weiner MW. Clinical Core of the Alzheimer’s disease neuroimaging initiative: progress and plans. Alzheimers Dement. 2010;6:239–246. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types