Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1990;31(2-4):122-8.
doi: 10.1159/000150146.

Comparative evaluation of an immunofluorescent antibody test, enzyme immunoassay and western blot for the detection of HIV-1 antibody

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparative evaluation of an immunofluorescent antibody test, enzyme immunoassay and western blot for the detection of HIV-1 antibody

J P Iltis et al. Intervirology. 1990.

Abstract

Screening blood and blood products for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) antibody is predominantly performed by enzyme immunoassay (EIA), and results must be confirmed by the more immunospecific Western blot (WB) assay. This study evaluated an HIV immunofluorescent antibody (IFA) test relative to WB assay for use in confirming EIA designated HIV-1 antibody-positive sera. Specimens from seroconversion and CDC panels as well as clinical specimens obtained for routine EIA HIV-1 antibody screening were evaluated. Results with 209 specimens indicated that sensitivity and specificity of the Fluorognost-HIV assay were equivalent relative to WB. In addition, the Fluorognost-HIV IFA test was faster and easier to perform than the WB assay, and unlike the WB assay was not prone to indeterminate results.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources