Bacterial, viral and turbidity removal by intermittent slow sand filtration for household use in developing countries: experimental investigation and modeling
- PMID: 21974872
- DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2011.09.022
Bacterial, viral and turbidity removal by intermittent slow sand filtration for household use in developing countries: experimental investigation and modeling
Abstract
A two-factor three-block experimental design was developed to permit rigorous evaluation and modeling of the main effects and interactions of sand size (d(10) of 0.17 and 0.52 mm) and hydraulic head (10, 20, and 30 cm) on removal of fecal coliform (FC) bacteria, MS2 bacteriophage virus, and turbidity, under two batch operating modes ('long' and 'short') in intermittent slow sand filters (ISSFs). Long operation involved an overnight pause time between feeding of two successive 20 L batches (16 h average batch residence time (RT)). Short operation involved no pause between two 20 L batch feeds (5h average batch RT). Conditions tested were representative of those encountered in developing country field settings. Over a ten week period, the 18 experimental filters were fed river water augmented with wastewater (influent turbidity of 5.4-58.6 NTU) and maintained with the wet harrowing method. Linear mixed modeling allowed systematic estimates of the independent marginal effects of each independent variable on each performance outcome of interest while controlling for the effects of variations in a batch's actual residence time, days since maintenance, and influent turbidity. This is the first study in which simultaneous measurement of bacteria, viruses and turbidity removal at the batch level over an extended duration has been undertaken with a large number of replicate units to permit rigorous modeling of ISSF performance variability within and across a range of likely filter design configurations and operating conditions. On average, the experimental filters removed 1.40 log fecal coliform CFU (SD 0.40 log, N=249), 0.54 log MS2 PFU (SD 0.42 log, N=245) and 89.0 percent turbidity (SD 6.9 percent, N=263). Effluent turbidity averaged 1.24 NTU (SD 0.53 NTU, N=263) and always remained below 3 NTU. Under the best performing design configuration and operating mode (fine sand, 10 cm head, long operation, initial HLR of 0.01-0.03 m/h), mean 1.82 log removal of bacteria (98.5%) and mean 0.94 log removal of MS2 viruses (88.5%) were achieved. Results point to new recommendations regarding filter design, manufacture, and operation for implementing ISSFs in local settings in developing countries. Sand size emerged as a critical design factor on performance. A single layer of river sand used in this investigation demonstrated removals comparable to those reported for 2 layers of crushed sand. Pause time and increased residence time each emerged as highly beneficial for improving removal performance on all four outcomes. A relatively large and significant negative effect of influent turbidity on MS2 viral removal in the ISSF was measured in parallel with a much smaller weaker positive effect of influent turbidity on FC bacterial removal. Disturbance of the schmutzdecke by wet harrowing showed no effect on virus removal and a modest reductive effect on the bacterial and turbidity removal as measured 7 days or more after the disturbance. For existing coarse sand ISSFs, this research indicates that a reduction in batch feed volume, effectively reducing the operating head and increasing the pore:batch volume ratio, could improve their removal performance by increasing batch residence time.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor--a review.Indian J Environ Health. 2001 Apr;43(2):1-82. Indian J Environ Health. 2001. PMID: 12397675 Review.
-
Intermittent versus continuous operation of biosand filters.Water Res. 2014 Feb 1;49:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2013.11.011. Epub 2013 Nov 19. Water Res. 2014. PMID: 24316177
-
Removal of particle-associated bacteriophages by dual-media filtration at different filter cycle stages and impacts on subsequent UV disinfection.Water Res. 2007 Jun;41(11):2393-406. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2007.02.047. Epub 2007 Apr 12. Water Res. 2007. PMID: 17433406
-
Modeling of slow sand filtration for disinfection of secondary clarifier effluent.Water Res. 2010 Jan;44(1):159-66. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2009.09.019. Epub 2009 Sep 12. Water Res. 2010. PMID: 19833374
-
Treatment of dairy wastewater using constructed wetlands and intermittent sand filters.Bioresour Technol. 2007 Sep;98(12):2268-81. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2006.07.036. Epub 2006 Sep 14. Bioresour Technol. 2007. PMID: 16973357 Review.
Cited by
-
Wastewater treatment by slow sand filters using uncoated and iron-coated fine sand: impact of hydraulic loading rate and media depth.Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Nov;26(33):34148-34156. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-3551-4. Epub 2018 Oct 30. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019. PMID: 30377959
-
The phenomenon of summer diarrhea and its waning, 1910-1930.Explor Econ Hist. 2020 Oct;78:101341. doi: 10.1016/j.eeh.2020.101341. Epub 2020 Jun 19. Explor Econ Hist. 2020. PMID: 33981117 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of Chitosans as Coagulants-Flocculants to Improve Sand Filtration for Drinking Water Treatment.Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Jan 9;24(2):1295. doi: 10.3390/ijms24021295. Int J Mol Sci. 2023. PMID: 36674812 Free PMC article.
-
Characterization and evaluation of recycled glass sand as water filtration media.J Water Health. 2025 Jun;23(6):780-793. doi: 10.2166/wh.2025.023. Epub 2025 Jun 9. J Water Health. 2025. PMID: 40586341
-
Slow Sand Filters for the 21st Century: A Review.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 5;20(2):1019. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20021019. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023. PMID: 36673775 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources