Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Oct 5:11:138.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-11-138.

Reproducibility and day time bias correction of optoelectronic leg volumetry: a prospective cohort study

Rolf P Engelberger  1 , Claudia Blazek, Felix Amsler, Hong H Keo, Frédéric Baumann, Werner Blättler, Iris Baumgartner, Torsten Willenberg
Affiliations

Reproducibility and day time bias correction of optoelectronic leg volumetry: a prospective cohort study

Rolf P Engelberger et al. BMC Med Res Methodol. .

Abstract

Background: Leg edema is a common manifestation of various underlying pathologies. Reliable measurement tools are required to quantify edema and monitor therapeutic interventions. Aim of the present work was to investigate the reproducibility of optoelectronic leg volumetry over 3 weeks' time period and to eliminate daytime related within-individual variability.

Methods: Optoelectronic leg volumetry was performed in 63 hairdressers (mean age 45 ± 16 years, 85.7% female) in standing position twice within a minute for each leg and repeated after 3 weeks. Both lower leg (legBD) and whole limb (limbBF) volumetry were analysed. Reproducibility was expressed as analytical and within-individual coefficients of variance (CVA, CVW), and as intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC).

Results: A total of 492 leg volume measurements were analysed. Both legBD and limbBF volumetry were highly reproducible with CVA of 0.5% and 0.7%, respectively. Within-individual reproducibility of legBD and limbBF volumetry over a three weeks' period was high (CVW 1.3% for both; ICC 0.99 for both). At both visits, the second measurement revealed a significantly higher volume compared to the first measurement with a mean increase of 7.3 ml ± 14.1 (0.33% ± 0.58%) for legBD and 30.1 ml ± 48.5 ml (0.52% ± 0.79%) for limbBF volume. A significant linear correlation between absolute and relative leg volume differences and the difference of exact day time of measurement between the two study visits was found (P < .001). A therefore determined time-correction formula permitted further improvement of CVW.

Conclusions: Leg volume changes can be reliably assessed by optoelectronic leg volumetry at a single time point and over a 3 weeks' time period. However, volumetry results are biased by orthostatic and daytime-related volume changes. The bias for day-time related volume changes can be minimized by a time-correction formula.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Relative legBD difference between visit 1 and 2 (calculated by: [legBD visit 2 - legBD visit 1]/legBD visit1) plotted against the time difference of measurement (calculated by: exact daytime of measurement at visit 2 - the exact daytime of measurmeent at visit 1) . legBD, lower leg without the foot (from B-measure to D-measure)
Figure 2
Figure 2
Absolute legBD difference between visit 1 and 2 (calculated by subtracting the legBD from visit 2 minus legBD from visit 1) plotted against the time difference of measurement (calculated by: exact daytime of measurement at visit 2 - the exact daytime of measurmeent at visit 1) . legBD, lower leg without the foot (from B-measure to D-measure)
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Ely JW, Osheroff JA, Chambliss ML, Ebell MH. Approach to leg edema of unclear etiology. J Am Board Fam Med. 2006;19(2):148–160. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.19.2.148. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Eklof B, Rutherford RB, Bergan JJ, Carpentier PH, Gloviczki P, Kistner RL, Meissner MH, Moneta GL, Myers K, Padberg FT. et al.Revision of the CEAP classification for chronic venous disorders: consensus statement. J Vasc Surg. 2004;40(6):1248–1252. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2004.09.027. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brijker F, Heijdra YF, Van Den Elshout FJ, Bosch FH, Folgering HT. Volumetric measurements of peripheral oedema in clinical conditions. Clin Physiol. 2000;20(1):56–61. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2281.2000.00224.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Perrin M, Guex JJ. Edema and leg volume: methods of assessment. Angiology. 2000;51(1):9–12. doi: 10.1177/000331970005100103. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Berard A, Kurz X, Zuccarelli F, Ducros JJ, Abenhaim L. Reliability study of the Leg-O-Meter, an improved tape measure device, in patients with chronic venous insufficiency of the leg. VEINES Group.(Venous Insufficiency Epidemiologic and Economic Study) Angiology. 1998;49(3):169–173. doi: 10.1177/000331979804900301. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types