Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2011 Dec;13(6):474-83.
doi: 10.1007/s11883-011-0210-3.

Effects of eicosapentaenoic acid versus docosahexaenoic acid on serum lipids: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Effects of eicosapentaenoic acid versus docosahexaenoic acid on serum lipids: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Melissa Y Wei et al. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2011 Dec.

Erratum in

  • Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2012 Feb;14(1):93

Abstract

Omega-3 fatty acid supplements containing both eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) have been shown to reduce triglycerides but also increase low-density lipoprotein (LDL). Whether EPA or DHA given as monotherapy has differential effects on serum lipoproteins has not been systematically evaluated. We performed a meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials of monotherapy with EPA (n=10), DHA (n=17), or EPA versus DHA (n=6). Compared with placebo, DHA raised LDL 7.23 mg/dL (95% CI, 3.98–10.5) whereas EPA non-significantly reduced LDL. In direct comparison studies, DHA raised LDL 4.63 mg/dL (95% CI, 2.15–7.10) more than EPA. Both EPA and DHA reduced triglycerides, with a greater reduction by DHA in direct comparison studies. DHA also raised high-density lipoprotein (4.49 mg/dL; 95% CI, 3.50–5.48) compared with placebo, whereas EPA did not. Although EPA and DHA both reduce triglycerides, they have divergent effects on LDL and high-density lipoprotein. Further research is needed to elucidate the mechanisms and significance of these differences.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. JAMA. 2005 Oct 12;294(14):1773-81 - PubMed
    1. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1996 Nov;50(11):765-71 - PubMed
    1. Am J Clin Nutr. 1997 May;65(5 Suppl):1645S-1654S - PubMed
    1. Int J Cardiol. 2009 Jul 24;136(1):4-16 - PubMed
    1. J Lipid Res. 1998 Feb;39(2):286-92 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources